Table 2. Cases of wrong IBD diagnosis.
CASE | AGE | SEX | IT | O | IBD | DX IBD | DX AMOEB | FCS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 35 | M | Y | L | Crohn’s | 31-01-08 | 13-02-08 | Serpiginous ulcers in the sigmoid colon and rectum |
2 | 51 | M | N | L | Crohn’s | 01-11-12 | 01-11-14 | Ulcers in colon and rectum |
3 | 31 | F | N | I | Crohn’s | 04–14 | 02–2017 | Deep serpiginous ulcers in transverse colon and cecum |
4 | 31 | F | Y | L | Crohn’s | 03–2012 | 05–2014 | Ulcers in rectum and ascending colon |
5 | 57 | M | Y | L | ulcerative colitis |
11–2017 | 12–2017 | Unstructured mucosa in cecum and rectum with deep serpiginous ulcers |
IT: Recent international travel (Yes/No)
O: Origin Local/Immigrant
IBD: Inflammatory bowel disease diagnosis
DX IBD: Date of IBD diagnosis
DX AMOEB: Date of amoebic colitis diagnosis
FCS: Results of fibre-optic colonoscopy