Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 19;93(5):e01432-18. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01432-18

TABLE 2.

Log likelihood values and estimated parameters under models in PAMLa

Model lnL 2ΔlnL P value Estimated parameter(s) Positive selection sites
M0 −5,972.703     ω = 0.344  
M1a −5,868.144 p0 = 0.667, p1 = 0.333 ω0 = 0.085, ω1 = 1
M2a −5,863.300 9.687 <0.01 p0 = 0.662, p1 = 0.331, p2 = 0.007 ω0 = 0.086, ω1 = 1, ω2 = 4.526 K157, A351
M7 −5,868.087 p = 0.237, q = 0.430
M8 −5,862.086 12.002 <0.005 p0 = 0.991, p = 0.252, q = 0.469 p1 = 0.009, ω = 3.784 K157, A351
a

Two pairs of site models with CODEML implemented in the PAML v 4.8 were performed. The first pair involves M1a (neutral, 2 site classes, ω > 1 not allowed) versus M2a (selection, 3 site classes, ω > 1 allowed), and the second pair consists of M7 (neutral, 10 site classes, ω > 1 not allowed) versus M8 (selection, 11 site classes, ω > 1 allowed). lnL, log likelihood.