Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 18;47(1):142–151. doi: 10.1177/0300060518798224

Table 3.

Demographic and clinical outcome data in recently published studies concerning surgical treatment of patients with Hoffa fracture.

First author Publication year Study period Patients (M/F)
Letenneur classification
Mean Age (years) Treatment Screw direction Mean follow-up (months) Mean time to bone union (weeks) Mean ROM Mean KSS
I II III
Onay9 2018 January 2000–December 2010 13 (11/2) 7 3 3 27.5 Two screws AP/PA 93 N/A 110° 78.4
Singh18 2017 2011–2014  7 (5/2) N/A N/A N/A 39.8 Two screws AP 28 N/A 111° 87.5
Trikha16 2017 January 2010–March 2015 32 (25/7) N/A N/A N/A 34.7 Two screws or two screws and plate AP >12 11.6 116° 83.2
Xu14 2016 April 2004–July 2013 11 (8/3) 7 0 4 38.5 Three screws AP/Cross 27.1 11.4 N/A 88.8
16 (11/5) 10 0 6 38.2 Two screws AP 11.9 N/A 87.9
Zhao8 2016 May 2006–May 2014 17 (13/4) 8 4 5 32.5 Two or three screws and plate PA 14.6 20.1 N/A 91.1
Gao7 2015 February 2005–February 2013 13 (8/5) 3 6 4 49 One or two screws and plate PA 23.5 15.2 124.6° 85.6
Current study 2018 May 2009–December 2016 24 (15/9) 8 6 10 37.2 Two screws and plate AP/PA 12 15 126.2° 88.3
21 (12/9) 7 6 8 32.6 Two screws AP/PA 12 17.1 120.5° 84.2

Data presented as n prevalence or mean value.

M, male; F, female; AP, anterior to posterior; PA, posterior to anterior; ROM, range of movement; KSS, Knee Society Score.