Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 28;12(3):403. doi: 10.3390/ma12030403

Table 2.

The experimental design matrix suggested by the central composite design (CCD) with the corresponding response results of the hydrochar yield (wt %).

Std Run Factor (A) Factor (B) Factor (C) Factor (D) Response (Yield%)
24 1 220 20 1 1:5 40.1
5 2 180 60 2 1:15 55.1
10 3 220 20 1 1:5 39.55
21 4 180 40 3 1:5 55.5
8 5 180 40 3 1:5 55.43
14 6 220 20 3 1:5 40.56
15 7 200 40 1 1:15 44.63
16 8 220 60 1 1:5 38.2
13 9 200 20 2 1:5 45.74
18 10 200 40 3 1:15 45.5
17 11 200 40 2 1:5 45.12
12 12 180 20 1 1:10 56.7
3 13 180 60 1 1:5 54.8
11 14 220 40 2 1:10 38.9
19 15 200 20 3 1:10 46.86
1 16 220 60 3 1:5 38.56
6 17 220 20 1 1:15 39.98
7 18 180 20 3 1:15 57.89
9 19 220 60 3 1:15 38.12
25 20 180 60 2 1:15 54.93
22 21 200 20 2 1:5 46.73
23 22 220 20 1 1:15 40.21
4 23 200 60 3 1:10 42.6
2 24 220 60 1 1:15 37.95
20 25 220 20 3 1:15 40.45