Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 1;24(3):536. doi: 10.3390/molecules24030536

Table 2.

‘Characteristic’ VOCs emitted from single berries of Frontenac, Marquette, St. Croix, and La Crescent grapes grown in Iowa and South Dakota. These VOCs were indicated to be the most representative variable from hierarchical clustering analysis after the PCA (JMP Pro 12.0.1, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

Sample Cluster No. of Members 2 Most Representative Variable 3 Cluster Proportion of Variation Explained 4 Total Proportion of Variation Explained 5
SD Frontenac (0.750) 1 1 2 Palmitic acid 0.830 0.415
2 2 Acetic acid 0.669 0.334
SD Marquette (0.870) 1 1 7 1,4-Butanolide 0.878 0.473
2 4 Ethyl octanoate 0.883 0.272
3 2 2-Ethyl-1-hexanol 0.819 0.126
IA St. Croix (0.896) 1 1 4 3-Methyl indole 1.000 0.500
2 3 Acetic acid 0.722 0.271
3 1 Benzyl alcohol 1.000 0.125
SD St. Croix (0.855) 1 1 3 Nonanal 0.802 0.241
3 3 Diacetone alcohol 0.713 0.214
2 2 1,4-Butanolide 1.000 0.200
4 1 5-(Hydroxymethyl)-2-furancarboxaldehyde 1.000 0.100
5 1 Ethyl acetate 1.000 0.100
IA La Crescent (0.909) 1 1 28 2-Ethyl-1-hexanol 0.973 0.757
2 4 3-Methyl indole 0.772 0.086
4 2 Ethanol 0.636 0.035
3 2 2-Phenylethanol 0.556 0.031
SD La Crescent (0.936) 1 1 3 2-Phenylethanol 1.000 0.300
3 3 Diacetone alcohol 0.853 0.256
4 2 Acetic acid 0.976 0.195
2 2 6-Methyl-5-hepten-2-one 0.926 0.185

1 The total proportion of variation explained by all the cluster components. 2 The number of variables in the cluster. 3 The cluster variable that has the largest squared correlation with its cluster component. 4 The cluster’s proportion of variance explained by the first principal component amount the variables in the cluster, based only on variables within the cluster. 5 The overall proportion of variance explained by the cluster component, using only the variables within each cluster to calculate the first principal component.