Table 2.
Sample | Cluster | No. of Members 2 | Most Representative Variable 3 | Cluster Proportion of Variation Explained 4 | Total Proportion of Variation Explained 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SD Frontenac (0.750) 1 | 1 | 2 | Palmitic acid | 0.830 | 0.415 |
2 | 2 | Acetic acid | 0.669 | 0.334 | |
SD Marquette (0.870) 1 | 1 | 7 | 1,4-Butanolide | 0.878 | 0.473 |
2 | 4 | Ethyl octanoate | 0.883 | 0.272 | |
3 | 2 | 2-Ethyl-1-hexanol | 0.819 | 0.126 | |
IA St. Croix (0.896) 1 | 1 | 4 | 3-Methyl indole | 1.000 | 0.500 |
2 | 3 | Acetic acid | 0.722 | 0.271 | |
3 | 1 | Benzyl alcohol | 1.000 | 0.125 | |
SD St. Croix (0.855) 1 | 1 | 3 | Nonanal | 0.802 | 0.241 |
3 | 3 | Diacetone alcohol | 0.713 | 0.214 | |
2 | 2 | 1,4-Butanolide | 1.000 | 0.200 | |
4 | 1 | 5-(Hydroxymethyl)-2-furancarboxaldehyde | 1.000 | 0.100 | |
5 | 1 | Ethyl acetate | 1.000 | 0.100 | |
IA La Crescent (0.909) 1 | 1 | 28 | 2-Ethyl-1-hexanol | 0.973 | 0.757 |
2 | 4 | 3-Methyl indole | 0.772 | 0.086 | |
4 | 2 | Ethanol | 0.636 | 0.035 | |
3 | 2 | 2-Phenylethanol | 0.556 | 0.031 | |
SD La Crescent (0.936) 1 | 1 | 3 | 2-Phenylethanol | 1.000 | 0.300 |
3 | 3 | Diacetone alcohol | 0.853 | 0.256 | |
4 | 2 | Acetic acid | 0.976 | 0.195 | |
2 | 2 | 6-Methyl-5-hepten-2-one | 0.926 | 0.185 |
1 The total proportion of variation explained by all the cluster components. 2 The number of variables in the cluster. 3 The cluster variable that has the largest squared correlation with its cluster component. 4 The cluster’s proportion of variance explained by the first principal component amount the variables in the cluster, based only on variables within the cluster. 5 The overall proportion of variance explained by the cluster component, using only the variables within each cluster to calculate the first principal component.