Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 21;4:4. doi: 10.1038/s41536-019-0069-4

Table 1.

Clinical examinations and outcomes

Patient number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Age (years) 42 45 30 50 52 59 55 54
BMI (kg/m2) 29.9 25.5 27.0 24.0 20.7 30.6 22.7 21.2
Duration of symptoms (years) 20 15 8 5 9 12 15 10
Type of OA PT PT PT Gen Gen Gen Gen Gen
Location of defect LFC LFC, PF MFC MFC MFC MFC MFC MFC, PF
Size of defect (cm2) 3.38 2.25
3.20
3.92 4.10 3.98 3.12 4.02 3.57
2.88
Outerbridge classification 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4
KL grade 2 2 2 3 4 3 3 3
Surgical treatments ACLR ACLR ACLR OWHTO OWHTO OWHTO OWHTO OWHTO
Thickness of RC (mm) 3.5 LFC 2.4
PF 4.2
3.1 3.2 3.6 3.4 2.4 MFC 2.1
PF 2.9
Viscoelasticity of RC by LIPA (preop. value) 0.87 (0.65) LFC 1.04 (0.74)
PF 1.06 (0.60)
0.98 (0.78) 0.87 (0.52) 0.89 (0.70) 0.90 (0.60) 0.88 (0.69) MFC 0.92 (0.58)
PF 0.88 (ND)
OARSI histological score 4 9 2 12 3 3 5 14
Mankin score 3 7 4 8 3 4 3 6
Histological appearance HL HL HL HL HL HL HL HL
Last follow-up date (months) 61 49 36 47 36 36 36 36

BMI body mass index, OA osteoarthritis, PT post-traumatic, Gen general, LFC lateral femoral condyle, PF patellofemoral groove, MFC medial femoral condyle, KL grade Kellgren–Lawrence grade, ACLR anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, OWHTO open-wedge high tibial osteotomy, RC regenerated cartilage, LIPA laser-induced photoacoustic measurement, ND not detectable, OARSI Osteoarthritis Research Society International, HL hyaline-like cartilage