Table 3.

Posterior modes obtained using the training datasets.

Species	Type	Area	C	$\rho$	$\mathcal{S}$(δ|θ)	$\mathcal{U}$
Ph. neglectus	Single	Fodele	4	100.0%	733.53 ± 19.12	79.6714
Ph. tobbi	Single	Steni	2	100.0%	44.29 ± 5.49	147.879
Ph. papatasi	Single	Geri	2	100.0%	31.36 ± 5.43	168.334
	Single	Steni	2	99.7%	41.71 ± 6.18	133.308
	Single	Fodele	2	100.0%	72.90 ± 5.51	138.493
	Combined A	Geri	2	100.0%	33.76 ± 3.85	104.499
		Steni		100.0%	54.61 ± 5.76	106.085
		Fodele		100.0%	96.11 ± 5.50	105.249
	Combined B	Geri	2	100.0%	33.40 ± 3.61	96.1643
		Steni		100.0%	47.82 ± 5.99	100.002
		Fodele		99.9%	92.73 ± 5.14	98.1116
	Combined C	Geri	2	100.0%	44.34 ± 5.17	103.678
		Steni		100.0%	134.80 ± 10.39	106.022
		Fodele		100.0%	85.51 ± 6.56	106.926

Single or combined inferences are listed with the associated sand fly species, annealing temperature (C), degree of success ($\rho$), average and standard deviation of the score ($\mathcal{S}$(δ|θ)), and the extent of dispersion in posterior modes ($\mathcal{U}$).