Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 21;10:889. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08847-1

Table 1.

Comparison of krill faecal pellet (FP) POC export at 100 m (this study) with literature estimates of total POC export

Data source/model algorithm POC export flux in the MIZa (GT C yr−1) Krill FP contribution to POC exportb (%) POC export flux south of 60 °Sc (GT C yr−1) Krill FP contribution to POC exportb (%)
This study -krill FPs only 0.039
Satellite-based estimates d
Carr, Henson 0.076 51.5 0.101 38.5
Carr, Dunne 0.122 32.0 0.152 25.6
Carr, Laws 0.209 18.6 0.281 13.8
Marra, Henson 0.082 47.2 0.104 37.4
Marra, Dunne 0.137 28.4 0.160 24.3
Marra, Laws 0.227 17.1 0.289 13.5
VGPM, Henson 0.064 60.6 0.090 43.3
VGPM, Dunne 0.103 37.6 0.135 28.8
VGPM, Laws 0.177 21.9 0.250 15.5
POC export models
Primeau et al. 2013e,f 0.22 17.7
Schlitzer et al. 2002e 1.00 3.9
MacCready et al. 2001e 0.31 12.5

aEstimates are for the productive season, October–March. For satellite-based estimates these are for the region south of the maximum ice extent during the productive period defined here (i.e. location of 15% sea ice concentration for period 1–13 October 1994–2014)

bPercentage contribution of our estimate of krill FP export flux (0.039 GT C yr −1) to various total POC export estimates

cAnnual export for the region south of 60 °S, with the exception of Schlitzer et al. (2002) and Primeau et al. (2013) which are for the regions south of 50 °S and 55–60 °S, respectively.

dNamed according to the input primary production and export (see methods)

eAnnual export

fExport at base of euphotic zone (73.4 m)