Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 21;10:884. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08621-3

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Ancestral character estimation of polygyny and syllable repertoire. At the tips of the tree, monogamy is indicated by black circles and polygyny is indicated by white circles. At the nodes of the tree, bars indicate the results of an ancestral character estimation algorithm, with the black fraction of the bar indicating the percent likelihood that the ancestor at that node was monogamous. The colors along the branches of the tree indicate the estimated ancestral syllable repertoire size. The syllable repertoire sizes ranged from 1 to 2400 in these species and were log10 transformed for analysis. Asterisks indicate nodes that had less than 70% support across 1000 tree replicates; no node had less than 50% support on this tree. Monogamous and polygynous species did not have significantly different syllable repertoire sizes (PhylANOVA p = 0.250). Images representing taxa were used or modified from PhyloPic (http://phylopic.org). Several images are used under Creative Commons licenses, with changes made where indicated: Sturnidae (credit to Maxime Dahirel, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), Estrildidae (credit to Jim Bendon for photography and T. Michael Keesey for vectorization, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/), Fringillidae (credit to Francesco Veronesi (vectorized by T. Michael Keesey), https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/), Emberizidae (credit to L. Shyamal, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/; this image was also adapted for Parulidae), and Mimidae and Motacillidae (credit to Michelle Site, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/, both adapted from the original image)