Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan-Feb;22(1):69–75. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_429_18

Table 4.

Perception of the smile attractiveness by gender

Gender, n (%) P

Male Female
Q1 Bilateral increase in width of central incisors by 1-2 mm 15 (12.9) 18 (14.1) 0.497
Unilateral increase in width of central incisors by 1-2 mm 11 (9.5) 18 (14.1)
Unaltered photograph 90 (77.6) 92 (71.9)
Q2 Unaltered photograph 47 (40.5) 43 (33.6) 0.523
Unilateral decrease in the width of central incisors by 1-2 mm 37 (31.9) 47 (36.7)
Bilateral decrease in the width of central incisors by 1-2 mm 32 (27.6) 38 (29.7)
Q3 Bilateral increase in length of central incisors by 1-2 mm 11 (9.5) 8 (6.3) 0.556
Unaltered photograph 99 (85.3) 115 (89.8)
Unilateral increase in length of central incisors by 1-2 mm 6 (5.2) 5 (3.9)
Q4 Unaltered photograph 63 (54.3) 67 (52.3) 0.332
Unilateral decrease in length of central incisors by 1-2 mm 8 (6.9) 16 (12.5)
Bilateral decrease in length of central incisors by 1-2 mm 45 (38.8) 45 (35.2)
Q5 Narrow buccal corridors (showing up to the distal surface of first premolar) 18 (15.5) 26 (20.3) 0.607
Unaltered photograph 63 (54.3) 64 (50.0)
Narrow buccal corridors (showing only up to the mesial surface of second premolar) 35 (30.2) 38 (29.7)
Q6 0 mm of gingival display 7 (6.0) 13 (10.2) 0.353
<3 mm gingival display 11 (9.5) 8 (6.3)
Unaltered photograph 98 (84.5) 107 (83.6)
Q7 Lower lip covering 1 mm of the upper anterior teeth 14 (12.1) 10 (7.8) 0.154
Unaltered photograph 82 (70.7) 104 (81.3)
Lower lip covering >1 mm of the upper anterior teeth 20 (17.2) 14 (10.9)
Q8 Reversed smile arc 18 (15.5) 16 (12.5) 0.685
Straight smile arc 30 (25.9) 30 (23.4)
Unaltered photograph 68 (58.6) 82 (64.1)
Q9 Lower midline shifted by 2 mm in relation to the upper midline 27 (23.3) 22 (17.2) 0.393
Unaltered photograph 52 (44.8) 67 (52.3)
Lower midline shifted by 1 mm in relation to the upper midline 37 (31.9) 39 (30.5)