Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 15;1(3):119–133. doi: 10.1515/pp-2016-0013

Table 1:

Key points, advantages and disadvantages of different methods to measure chemosensitivity and resistance.

Name Measures Key point of the method Advantage Disadvantage
Viability assay − The number of cells − Cell counting with an exclusion dye – Direct measurement – Laborious– subjective
Colorimetric assays − The metabolic activity of cells − Metabolic conversion of a product by the cells, accompanied with change of color – Easy and fast – Indirect – Except Alamar blue, toxic to cells
Automated high throughput confocal microscopy − Live and dead cells − Automated high throughput confocal microscopy based method − Allows simultaneous analysis of a large number of drugs – Useful for large scale drug sensitivity and resistance screening – Does not consider the benign cell component
Clonogenic assay − The ability of cells to grow and form colonies − Single cell suspension is plated and the growing colonies are counted – Distinguishes between cytostatic and cytotoxic effects– accurate – Not suitable for cells which are unable to form colonies or low proliferating cells – Multiple drugs cannot be tested – Tumor cells are dissociated, the effect of extracellular environment is lost
Fluorescence Activated Cell Sorting (FACS) − Apoptosis − Cell cycle progression− DNA content of cells − Annexin/Propidium Iodide staining is combined with tumor specific immunological staining − Fluorescent-based assays where the dye interchalate with double stranded DNA – Allows measurement of cytotoxic effects in a mixed cell population – Direct measurement – Laborious if a large number of drugs are tested