(
A–D) Silencing E-PG neurons impairs the flies’ capacity to maintain an arbitrary heading to a bright spot resembling the sun. (
A) Flight headings to sun stimulus in
empty-Split/UAS Kir 2.1 control flies. Plotting convention same as
Figure 7E–G. N = 72 flights, 36 flies. (
B) Flight headings to sun stimulus in
ss00096 Split-Gal4 (E-PG neurons)/UAS-Kir2.1 flies. N = 50 flights, 25 flies. (
C) Cumulative probability distribution of vector strength values for flights to sun stimulus.
empty Split-Gal4 UAS-Kir2.1 (black line), mean = 0.43, N = 72 flights, 36 flies;
ss00096 Split-Gal4/UAS-Kir2.1 (purple line), mean = 0.32, N = 50 flights, 25 flies. p=0.001, permutation test for significant difference in mean. (
D) Cumulative probability distribution of mean absolute heading for flights to sun stimulus.
empty Split-Gal4 UAS-Kir2.1 (black line), mean = 52.7°, N = 61 flights, 36 flies; ss00096
Split-Gal4/UAS-Kir2.1 (purple line), mean = 32.2°, N = 37 flights, 23 flies. p=0.011, permutation test for significant difference in mean. (
E–H) Transient removal of Eyeless in larvae at the time of E-PG development (as in
Figure 7) has no effect on stripe fixation behavior in adult flies. Plotting conventions as in
Figure 7E–G. (
E) Schematic of behavioral apparatus; flies controlled rotation of a dark vertical stripe with their wing strokes. (
F) Control ts.Eyeless
RNAi no heat pulse. N = 19 flies. Flight headings are tightly clustered around 0°, where stripe is in front of fly. (
G) Control ts.mcherry
RNAi flies with heat pulse. N = 18 flies. (
H) Experimental ts.Eyeless
RNAi flies with heat pulse. Heading distribution remains centered around 0°. N = 21 flies. (
I) Cumulative probability distribution of vector strength values for stripe stimuli with control groups (black and gray) and experimental group (red). We observed no significant difference between means for all genotypes.