Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 11;219(6):936–944. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiy591

Table 2.

Multivariable Analysis to Test the Effect of Different Covariates on the Risk of Developing Febrile Malaria

Covariate Hazard Ratio Robust SE z P>|z| Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Main
Transmission (high vs low) 0.98 0.35 −0.05 .957 0.49 1.96
Transmission (high vs mod-high) 16.55 5.43 8.55 <.0001 8.70 31.49
Transformed age 5.29 1.50 5.86 <.0001 3.03 9.22
Transmission (high vs low) × transformed age 0.60 0.21 −1.43 .154 0.30 1.21
Transmission (high vs mod-high) × transformed age 0.24 0.07 −4.59 <.0001 0.13 0.44
Infection status (uninfected vs asymptomatic) 0.21 0.07 −4.97 <.0001 0.12 0.39
Transmission (high vs low) × infection status (uninfected vs asymptomatic) 2.43 0.45 4.81 <.0001 1.69 3.49
Transmission (high vs mod-high) × infection status (uninfected vs asymptomatic) 0.25 0.07 −5.29 <.0001 0.15 0.42
Infection status (uninfected vs asymptomatic) × transformed age 3.32 0.93 4.27 <.0001 1.91 5.76
Year of survey 0.95 0.01 −5.72 <.0001 0.93 0.97
Infection status (uninfected vs asymptomatic) × year of survey 1.12 0.02 5.35 <.0001 1.07 1.17
Time varying covariates
Infection status (uninfected vs asymptomatic) 0.69 0.08 −3.39 0.001 0.56 0.85
Year of survey 0.94 0.01 −7.34 <0.0001 0.92 0.95

Abbreviations: mod-high, moderate-high; SE, standard error.

This final model shows the effect of the different covariates on developing febrile episodes with alternative cutoff times of <90 and >90 days. The P values in bold represent those that were statistically significant (P < .05). The symbol × indicates an interaction between the respective covariates.