Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 9;20(3):733. doi: 10.3390/ijms20030733

Table 1.

Genome proportion of annotated repeats in all three species in a comparative analysis.

Repeat Annotation Genomic Proportion %
A. cepa A. ursinum A. sativum
mobile_element/Class_II/Subclass_1/TIR/EnSpm_CACTA 0.12 0.64 0.07
mobile_element/Class_I/LINE 9.18 × 10−4 0.27 6.90 × 10−4
mobile_element/Class_I/SINE 4.59 × 10−4 0.17 0.09
mobile_element/Class_I/LTR/Ty1_copia/SIRE 3.12 1.11 0.58
mobile_element/Class_I/LTR/Ty1_copia/TAR 0.28 0.44 0.29
mobile_element/Class_I/LTR/Ty1_copia/Tork 0.00 0.05 0.00
mobile_element/Class_I/LTR/Ty3_gypsy/chromovirus/CRM 0.66 1.96 × 10−3 0.00
mobile_element/Class_I/LTR/Ty3_gypsy/chromovirus/Tekay 24.86 45.51 47.88
mobile_element/Class_I/LTR/Ty3_gypsy/non-chromovirus/OTA/Athila 0.08 0.14 0.13
mobile_element/Class_I/LTR/Ty3_gypsy/non-chromovirus/OTA/Ogre_Tat/TatV 3.22 4.30 1.16
rDNA/45S_rDNA 0.38 0.26 0.33
rDNA/5S_rDNA 0.01 2.08 × 10−3 0.05
satellite 1.68 0.17 0.31
mobile_element/Class_I/LTR/TRIM 0.13 0.16 0.53
unknown in analyzed clusters 2.12 0.73 1.26
total in analyzed clusters 36.65 53.95 52.68
small clusters that were not analyzed 16.74 11.92 11.43
non-clustered reads 46.61 34.13 35.89
total 100.00 100.00 100.00