Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 12;13:337–346. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S185692

Table 4.

VA and uncorrected refractive error

Right eye Left eye

VA at presentation, n (%)
 Normal (20/30 or better) 213 (61) 214 (61)
 Reduced, improvement with refraction 122 (35) 119 (34)
Correctable to 20/30 or better 92 (26) 85 (24)
 Impaired, no improvement with refraction 16 (5) 18 (5)
Improvement in VA with refraction
 Presenting VA, all patients
   LogMAR, mean ± SD, n 0.28±0.36, 351 0.30±0.43, 350
   Snellen equivalent, mean 20/38 20/40
 Best-corrected VA, all patients
   LogMAR, mean ± SD, n 0.12±0.27, 351 0.14±0.34, 350
   Snellen equivalent, mean 20/26 20/28
 Improvement in VA, all patients
   LogMAR, mean ± SD, n 0.15±0.23, 351 0.16±0.23, 350
   Lines gained,a mean 1.5 1.6
 Improvement in VA, patients with refractionb
   LogMAR, mean ± SD, n 0.29±0.24, 187 0.29±0.24, 190
   Lines gained,a mean 2.9 2.9

Notes: Distance VA was used for analysis. VA measurements were taken using a Snellen chart. Acuity was assessed with correction for patients who presented with spectacles. Nine patients had missing data or VA that could not be converted to logMAR (hand motions or worse; fix-and-follow). An additional patient had hand motions or worse VA in the left eye than the right. VA was considered improved with refraction if at least one Snellen line was gained on manifest refraction.

a

Lines of vision gained on the ETDRS chart, by which an improvement of 0.1 logMAR equals a gain of one line.

b

Includes all patients whose vision improved with refraction by any amount regardless of presenting VA.

Abbreviations: ETDRS, Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study; VA, visual acuity; logMAR, logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution.