Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 10;2019:5729568. doi: 10.1155/2019/5729568

Table 6.

Antimicrobial-resistance patterns between biofilm and nonbiofilm former bacterial isolates from urinary catheterized inpatients of JUMC, Southwest Ethiopia, 2016.

Antimicrobials Susceptibility pattern# Biofilm formation pattern and antimicrobial resistance (%) Chi-square
BP (N=43) NBP (N=11) Odds ratio p value
AMC Sensitive 11 (25.6) 7 (63.6) 5.71 0.017
Resistant 32 (74.4) 4 (36.4)

CIP Sensitive 23 (53.5) 10 (90.9) 5.16 0.023
Resistant 20 (46.5) 1 (9.1)

CRO Sensitive 17 (39.5) 8 (72.7) 3.88 0.049
Resistant 26 (60.5) 3 (27.3)

GN Sensitive 5 (11.6) 4 (38.4) 3.86 0.0495
Resistant 38 (88.4) 7 (63.6)

F Sensitive 26 (60.5) 9 (81.8) 1.75 0.186
Resistant 17 (39.5) 2 (18.2)

SXT Sensitive 9 (20.9) 4 (36.4) 1.14 0.285∗∗
Resistant 34 (79.1) 7 (63.6)

Tet Sensitive 8 (18.6) 4 (36.4) 1.60 0.206∗∗
Resistant 35 (81.4) 7 (63.6)

AK Sensitive 33 (76.7) 10 (90.9) 1.08 0.298∗∗
Resistant 10 (23.3) 1 (9.1)

Biofilm-forming bacteria with tendency to become more antimicrobial resistant compared with that of nonbiofilm producing ones (p ≤ 0.05). ∗∗Nonsignificant. #Very little intermediate susceptibilities of isolate results were merged to susceptible category.