Table 3.
The correlation matrices of mean performance of leaffolder resistance and leaf related traits across three environments.
| E1 |
E2 |
E3 |
|||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DA | DS | LL | LW | DA | DS | LL | LW | DA | DS | LL | LW | ||
| E1 | DA | 1.00 | |||||||||||
| DS | 0.90∗∗∗ | 1.00 | |||||||||||
| LL | 0.13 | 0.16 | 1.00 | ||||||||||
| LW | 0.41∗∗ | 0.47∗∗ | 0.04 | 1.00 | |||||||||
| E2 | DA | 0.94∗∗∗ | 0.85∗∗∗ | 0.15 | 0.39 | 1.00 | |||||||
| DS | 0.76∗∗∗ | 0.80∗∗∗ | 0.10 | 0.54∗∗∗ | 0.82∗∗∗ | 1.00 | |||||||
| LL | −0.07 | −0.01 | 0.36∗∗ | 0.01 | −0.05 | −0.01 | 1.00 | ||||||
| LW | 0.49∗∗∗ | 0.48∗∗∗ | −0.06 | 0.55∗∗∗ | 0.47∗∗∗ | 0.51∗∗∗ | −0.03 | 1.00 | |||||
| E3 | DA | 0.89∗∗∗ | 0.81∗∗∗ | 0.13 | 0.41∗∗ | 0.90∗∗∗ | 0.72∗∗∗ | −0.01 | 0.49 | 1.00 | |||
| DS | 0.81∗∗∗ | 0.82∗∗∗ | 0.17 | 0.50∗∗ | 0.84∗∗∗ | 0.80∗∗∗ | 0.01 | 0.49∗∗∗ | 0.92∗∗∗ | 1.00 | |||
| LL | −0.17 | −0.18 | 0.16 | 0.01 | −0.17 | −0.18 | 0.32∗∗ | −0.11 | −0.14 | −0.14 | 1.00 | ||
| LW | 0.42∗∗ | 0.44∗∗ | 0.04 | 0.64∗∗∗ | 0.40 | 0.47∗∗ | 0.02 | 0.56∗∗∗ | 0.43∗∗ | 0.45∗∗ | 0.11 | 1.00 | |
Significance levels: ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, and ∗∗∗P < 0.001. DA, damaged area; DS, damage score; LL, leaf length, LW, leaf width; E1 = wet season 2013; E2 = dry season 2013–2014; E3 = wet season 2014.