Table 4.
Model 1 | Model 2 | |
---|---|---|
HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | |
SEER SUMMARY STAGE 2000a | ||
Local (reference) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Regional | 4.03 (2.76, 5.91) | 4.01 (2.75, 5.86) |
Distant | 26.30 (17.4, 39.76) | 24.70 (16.47, 37.04) |
AGE, YEARS | ||
30–39 (reference) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
40–49 | 0.59 (0.33, 1.07) | 0.58 (0.32, 1.04) |
50–59 | 0.78 (0.46, 1.33) | 0.77 (0.46, 1.30) |
60–69 | 1.01 (0.59, 1.72) | 0.99 (0.59, 1.68) |
70+ | 1.25 (0.72, 2.16) | 1.16 (0.67, 1.99) |
RACE | ||
White (reference) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Black | 1.08 (0.80, 1.46) | 0.88 (0.62, 1.25) |
CDI | ||
1 SD Increase | – | 1.19 (1.01, 1.39) |
The event of interest is breast cancer-related death among triple negative breast cancer patients in Louisiana, diagnosed 2010–2012. HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; SEER, Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program; CDI, concentrated disadvantage index; SD, standard deviation.
Model 1 is adjusted for SEER stage, age and race. Model 2 is adjusted for SEER stage, age, race and CDI.
Models include random intercept (frailty term) for US census tracts.