Eftekhari 2009.

Methods	2‐arm active‐controlled randomised trial
Participants	100 women were randomised in a hospital setting in Iran. The population comprised women of unspecified parity, a singleton pregnancy, at high risk for PPH, who delivered by elective caesarean section. Exclusion criteria comprised women with multiple pregnancy, prolonged labour more than 12 hours, 2 or more previous caesarean sections, previous uterine rupture, Hb less than 80 g/L,who had a history of heart, renal or liver disorders or had a coagulopathy did not enter the study.
Interventions	400 mcg of misoprostol administered sublingually versus 20 IU of oxytocin administered by an IV infusion
Outcomes	The study recorded the following outcomes: additional uterotonics; blood loss (mL); change in Hb
Notes	Contact with study authors for additional information: yes. Additional data from authors: no
Risk of bias
Bias	Authors' judgement	Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias)	Unclear risk	By a simple randomisation method, patients were allocated into 2 equal groups.
Allocation concealment (selection bias)	Unclear risk	Allocation concealment was not reported.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes	High risk	Study participants and caregivers were not blinded to treatment allocations.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes	Unclear risk	Assessor blinding was not reported.
Objective assessment of blood loss	Low risk	Investigators appraised blood loss by collection in a suction bottle, and with drapes and pads beneath the mother. Amniotic fluid was suctioned and measured, and then subtracted from the total volume of the suction bottle. Meanwhile the known dry weight(s) of drapes and pads were subtracted from the soaked weights of these materials. Measurements of blood collected in the suction bottle and on drapes and pads were added together.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes	Unclear risk	The study authors did not mention any incomplete outcome data.
Selective reporting (reporting bias)	High risk	The protocol of the study was unavailable for verification, but not all of the outcomes projected by methodological descriptions were reported as results in the study report (cases of transfusion were omitted).
Intention to treat analysis	Unclear risk	The authors did not specify whether all those who were enrolled and randomly allocated to treatment were included in the analysis, in the groups to which they were randomised.
Funding source	Unclear risk	Source(s) of funding for the study were not reported.