Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 19;2018(12):CD011689. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011689.pub3

Fu 2003.

Methods 2‐arm controlled randomised trial
Participants 156 women were randomised in a hospital setting in China. The population comprised women of unspecified parity, unspecified whether singleton or multiple pregnancy, at both high and low risk for PPH, who delivered by vaginal delivery. Exclusion criteria were not specified.
Interventions 400 mcg of misoprostol administered orally versus no treatment
Outcomes The study recorded the following outcomes: PPH at 500; blood loss (mL).
Notes Contact with study authors for additional information: no. Additional data from authors: no
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Sequence generation was not reported.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Allocation concealment was not reported.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Blinding (of study participants and caregivers) was unclear.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Assessor blinding was not reported.
Objective assessment of blood loss High risk Investigators appraised blood loss in the 2 hours after delivery and after all amniotic fluids had been drained, by collection in a small tray and absorption into disposable, sterile, water‐resistant gauze. The contents were weighed and volume was determined on the basis that 1.05 g is equivalent to 1 mL of blood. A measuring cup was used to estimate the blood in the tray; blood that soaked into the gauze was measured on the basis that material measuring 10 cm by 10 cm holds 10 mL of blood. These 3 measurements were combined to ascertain total blood loss.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk The study authors did not mention any incomplete outcome data.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk The protocol of the study was unavailable for verification.
Intention to treat analysis Unclear risk The authors did not specify whether all those who were enrolled and randomly allocated to treatment were included in the analysis, in the groups to which they were randomised.
Funding source Unclear risk Source(s) of funding for the study were not reported.