Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 19;2018(12):CD011689. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011689.pub3

Gavilanes 2016.

Methods 2‐arm active‐controlled randomised trial
Participants 100 women were randomised in a hospital setting in Equador. The population comprised women of unspecified parity, a singleton pregnancy, at high risk for PPH, who delivered by elective caesarean section. Exclusion criteria comprised women with Hb less than 80 g/L, multiple pregnancy, polyhydramnios, previous uterine rupture, bleeding disorders, intrauterine death or hyperthermia (more than 38.5C).
Interventions 400 mcg of misoprostol administered sublingually versus 10 IU of oxytocin administered by an IV infusion
Outcomes The study recorded the following outcomes: PPH at 500; PPH at 1000; additional uterotonics; blood loss (mL); nausea; vomiting; headache; shivering.
Notes Contact with study authors for additional information: yes. Additional data from authors: yes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Computer‐generated randomisation.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Allocation concealment was not reported.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Study participants and caregivers were not blinded to treatment allocations.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Assessor blinding was not reported.
Objective assessment of blood loss Low risk Investigators appraised postoperative blood loss by collection with quote: "suction apparatus and sterile drapes before irrigation" and by weighing the blood collected in abdominal swabs and gauzes with a calibrated scale (Zhongshan Camry Electronic Co Ltd, model EK 4052‐E, Guangdong, China). Investigators estimated the volume of blood loss quote: "by subtraction of amniotic fluid at 30 cc per each centimetre reported by amniotic fluid index".
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk The study authors did not mention any incomplete outcome data.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk The protocol of the study was unavailable for verification.
Intention to treat analysis Unclear risk The authors did not specify whether all those who were enrolled and randomly allocated to treatment were included in the analysis, in the groups to which they were randomised.
Funding source Unclear risk Source(s) of funding for the study were not reported.