Methods |
2‐arm active‐controlled randomised trial |
Participants |
200 women were randomised in a hospital setting in India. The population comprised women of parity 4 or less, a singleton pregnancy, at low risk for PPH, who delivered by vaginal delivery. Exclusion criteria comprised women with anaemia, pregnancy‐induced hypertension, placental abruption/placenta praevia, multiple pregnancy, grand multiparous, malpresentation, polyhydramnios, previous uterine scar, chorioamnionitis, prolonged labour, intrauterine fetal death, coagulation disorder, asthma/epilepsy/heart/renal disorder. |
Interventions |
125 mcg of carboprost administered IM versus 200 mcg of ergometrine administered by an IV bolus |
Outcomes |
The study recorded the following outcomes: blood loss (mL); change in Hb; third stage duration (minutes); diarrhoea; nausea; vomiting; fever; shivering. |
Notes |
Contact with study authors for additional information: no. Additional data from authors: no |
Risk of bias |
Bias |
Authors' judgement |
Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) |
Unclear risk |
Sequence generation was not reported. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) |
Unclear risk |
Allocation concealment was not reported. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes |
Unclear risk |
Blinding (of study participants and caregivers) was unclear. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes |
Unclear risk |
Assessor blinding was not reported. |
Objective assessment of blood loss |
Low risk |
Amount of blood loss was calculated by weighing the gauzes/sponges before delivery followed by again weighing them after delivery. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes |
Unclear risk |
The study authors did not mention any incomplete outcome data. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) |
Unclear risk |
The protocol of the study was unavailable for verification. |
Intention to treat analysis |
Unclear risk |
The authors did not specify whether all those who were enrolled and randomly allocated to treatment were included in the analysis, in the groups to which they were randomised. |
Funding source |
Unclear risk |
Source(s) of funding for the study were not reported. |