Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 19;2018(12):CD011689. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011689.pub3

Modi 2014.

Methods 4‐arm active‐controlled randomised trial
Participants 100 women were randomised in a hospital setting in India. The population comprised women of parity 3 or less, a singleton pregnancy, at low risk for PPH, who delivered by vaginal delivery. Exclusion criteria comprised women with gestations less than 37 or more than 42 weeks, intrauterine death, fetal growth restriction, hypertensive or cardiac or renal disorders, multiple pregnancies, placenta praevia, placenta abruption, grand multiparous, coagulation disorders, anaemia (< 8 g/dL), tachycardia or hypotension, malpresentations, chorioamnionitis, or known allergy to prostaglandins.
Interventions 10 IU of oxytocin administered IM versus 200 mcg of ergometrine administered by an IV bolus versus 125 mcg of carboprost administered IM versus 600 mcg of misoprostol administered rectally
Outcomes The study recorded the following outcomes: PPH at 500; PPH at 1000; additional uterotonics; transfusion; Blood loss (mL); third stage duration (minutes).
Notes Contact with study authors for additional information: no. Additional data from authors: no
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Sequence generation was not reported.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Allocation concealment was not reported.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Blinding (of study participants and caregivers) was unclear.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Assessor blinding was not reported.
Objective assessment of blood loss Low risk Used BRASS‐V drapes to measure the blood loss.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk The study authors did not mention any incomplete outcome data.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk The protocol of the study was unavailable for verification.
Intention to treat analysis Unclear risk The authors did not specify whether all those who were enrolled and randomly allocated to treatment were included in the analysis, in the groups to which they were randomised.
Funding source Low risk No funding sought for this study.