Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 19;2018(12):CD011689. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011689.pub3

Shrestha 2011.

Methods 2‐arm active‐controlled randomised trial
Participants 200 women were randomised in a hospital setting in Nepal. The population comprised women of any parity, a singleton pregnancy, at low risk for PPH, who delivered by vaginal delivery. Exclusion criteria comprised women with polyhydramnios, chorioamnionitis, preterm labour, previous caesarean, asthma, cardiac disorder or contraindication/hypersensitivity to the use of prostaglandin and uterotonics.
Interventions 1000 mcg of misoprostol administered rectally versus 10 IU of oxytocin administered IM
Outcomes The study recorded the following outcomes: PPH at 500; severe maternal morbidity: intensive care admissions; death; blood loss (mL); change in Hb; third stage duration (minutes); fever; abdominal pain.
Notes Contact with study authors for additional information: yes. Additional data from authors: yes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Randomly allocated as per the lottery technique.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Allocation concealment was not reported.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Study participants and caregivers were not blinded to treatment allocations.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Assessor blinding was not reported.
Objective assessment of blood loss Low risk Investigators appraised blood loss in the 48 hours postpartum, by collection with pre‐weighed sterile pads and a calibrated bucket. All the soaked drapes and pads were weighed and the dry weights of these materials were subtracted to calculate blood loss on the basis that 1 g is equivalent to 1 mL.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Data were collected completely from all randomised study participants.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk The protocol of the study was unavailable for verification.
Intention to treat analysis Unclear risk The authors did not specify whether all those who were enrolled and randomly allocated to treatment were included in the analysis, in the groups to which they were randomised.
Funding source Unclear risk Source(s) of funding for the study were not reported.