Methods |
2‐arm active‐controlled randomised trial |
Participants |
200 women were randomised in a hospital setting in Nepal. The population comprised women of any parity, a singleton pregnancy, at low risk for PPH, who delivered by vaginal delivery. Exclusion criteria comprised women with polyhydramnios, chorioamnionitis, preterm labour, previous caesarean, asthma, cardiac disorder or contraindication/hypersensitivity to the use of prostaglandin and uterotonics. |
Interventions |
1000 mcg of misoprostol administered rectally versus 10 IU of oxytocin administered IM |
Outcomes |
The study recorded the following outcomes: PPH at 500; severe maternal morbidity: intensive care admissions; death; blood loss (mL); change in Hb; third stage duration (minutes); fever; abdominal pain. |
Notes |
Contact with study authors for additional information: yes. Additional data from authors: yes |
Risk of bias |
Bias |
Authors' judgement |
Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) |
Low risk |
Randomly allocated as per the lottery technique. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) |
Unclear risk |
Allocation concealment was not reported. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes |
High risk |
Study participants and caregivers were not blinded to treatment allocations. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes |
Unclear risk |
Assessor blinding was not reported. |
Objective assessment of blood loss |
Low risk |
Investigators appraised blood loss in the 48 hours postpartum, by collection with pre‐weighed sterile pads and a calibrated bucket. All the soaked drapes and pads were weighed and the dry weights of these materials were subtracted to calculate blood loss on the basis that 1 g is equivalent to 1 mL. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes |
Low risk |
Data were collected completely from all randomised study participants. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) |
Unclear risk |
The protocol of the study was unavailable for verification. |
Intention to treat analysis |
Unclear risk |
The authors did not specify whether all those who were enrolled and randomly allocated to treatment were included in the analysis, in the groups to which they were randomised. |
Funding source |
Unclear risk |
Source(s) of funding for the study were not reported. |