Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 19;2018(12):CD011689. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011689.pub3

Vagge 2014.

Methods 2‐arm active‐controlled randomised trial
Participants 200 women were randomised in a hospital setting in India. The population comprised women of parity 4 or less, a singleton pregnancy, at low risk for PPH, who delivered by vaginal delivery. Exclusion criteria comprised women undergoing caesarean section, or those with cardiac disorder in pregnancy, uterine tumour in pregnancy, secondary PPH, grand multiparity (not defined), multiple pregnancy, polyhydramnios, anaemia, coagulopathy, antepartum haemorrhage, previous PPH, prolonged labour, precipitate labour or known allergic or hypersensitivity reaction to prostaglandins.
Interventions 10 IU of oxytocin administered by an IV infusion versus 800 mcg of misoprostol administered rectally
Outcomes The study recorded the following outcomes: PPH at 500; PPH at 1000; additional uterotonics; transfusion; blood loss (mL); diarrhoea; nausea; fever; shivering.
Notes Contact with study authors for additional information: no. Additional data from authors: no
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Used simple random sampling.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Allocation concealment was not reported.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Study participants and caregivers were not blinded to treatment allocations.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Assessor blinding was not reported.
Objective assessment of blood loss Unclear risk Methods of appraising blood loss were not reported.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk The study authors did not mention any incomplete outcome data.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk The protocol of the study was unavailable for verification.
Intention to treat analysis Unclear risk The authors did not specify whether all those who were enrolled and randomly allocated to treatment were included in the analysis, in the groups to which they were randomised.
Funding source Unclear risk Source(s) of funding for the study were not reported.