Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Feb 25.
Published in final edited form as: J Appl Microbiol. 2016 Oct 23;121(6):1603–1615. doi: 10.1111/jam.13284

Table 3.

Summary of pilot-scale decontamination efficacy results for Bacillus atrophaeus spores

Test ID Carpet Ceiling tile Unpainted
concrete
Glass Painted
wallboard
Laminate Wood Galvanized
metal
Avg by test*
Test C1 7·04 ± 1·21 6·46 ± 0·54 1·90 ± 1·10 6·45 ± 1·78 5·90 ± 0·71 6·82 ± 1·27 6·53 ± 0·43
Test C2 7·61 ± 0·00 6·77 ± 0·00 7·17 ± 0·00 7·45 ± 0·00 7·54 ± 0·01 7·88 ± 0·02 7·46 ± 0·00 7·31 ± .34
Test C3 7·61 ± 0·00 6·66 ± 0 7·29 ± 0·07 7·63 ± 0·07 7·80 ± 0·01 7·78 ± 0·00 7·35 ± 0·00 7·40 ± .45
Test C4 7·50 ± 0·01 6·56 ± 0 7·48 ± 0·07 7·36 ± 0 7·46 ± 0 7·76 ± 0·02 7·43 ± 0 7·27 ± .4
Test C5 7·25 ± 0·23 6·62 ± 0 7·28 ± 0·08 7·19 ± 0·01 7·54 ± 0 7·36 ± 0·31 7·47 ± 0 7·18 ± .34
Test C6 6·89 ± 0·68 4·85 ± 0·41 7·74 ± 0 7·50 ± 0·07 7·13 ± 0·37 7·89 ± 0·01 6·62 ± 1·48 6·82 ± 1·15
Test C7 5·83 ± 1·02 5·71 ± 0·92 6·70 ± 0·82 5·53 ± 1·39 7·02 ± 0·76 7·62 ± 0·27 4·04 ± 2·29 6·16 ± .66
Test C8 7·70 ± 0·17 6·35 ± 0·48 7·19 ± 0·07 6·89 ± 0·81 7·55 ± 0 7·65 ± 0·09 6·79 ± 0·98 7·14 ± .54
Test C9 6·08 ± 2·13 6·64 ± 0·07 6·16 ± 1·19 6·59 ± 1·01 7·30 ± 0 7·31 ± 0·06 6·12 ± 1·32 6·55 ± .49
Test C10 7·75 ± 0 6·52 ± 0·25 6·76 ± 0·73 6·48 ± 0·85 7·63 ± 0 7·64 ± 0·02 5·54 ± 2·02 7·03 ± .62
Avg by material 7·13 ± 0·62 6·31 ± 0·68 1·09 ± 1·63 7·02 ± 0·50 6·85 ± 0·71 7·38 ± 0·30 7·65 ± 0·19 6·45 ± 1·12

Results are average of log reductions ± SD on coupons for each of the three locations where coupons were placed: above ceiling tile, on desk and below desk. Log reduction results in bold indicate all test coupons (n = 9; 3 replicates at each location) for that material were completely decontaminated.

*

Average LR by test calculated using materials common for all tests (carpet, ceiling tile, glass, painted wallboard and laminate).

Unpainted concrete was only included in first test.