. 2019 Feb 22;7(2):2325967119826094. doi: 10.1177/2325967119826094

TABLE 1.

Included Studies^a

Clinical Outcomes
Study	Follow-up, n/N (%)			Male/Female, n				Mean Age, y			Mean Follow-up, mo		Mean Graft Diameter, mm
Study	4HS		5HS	4HS		5HS		4HS		5HS	4HS	5HS	4HS		5HS
Calvo et al⁶ (2017)	33/33 (100.0)		37/37 (100.0)	NR		NR		29.7		30.2	32.2	30.4	8.50		9.20
Krishna et al¹⁸ (2018)	—		25/30 (80.3)	—		19/6		—		25.6	—	17.8	—		9.06
Krishna et al¹⁹ (2018)	20/21 (95.2)		25/27 (92.6)	19/1		19/6		29.2		25.6	16.8	17.8	8.13		9.06
Total	53/54 (98.1)		87/96 (90.1)	19/1		57/13		29.5		27.6	26.4	23.2	8.36		9.12
Biomechanical Results
Study		Graft Material			No. of Specimens				Graft Testing Method					Suture Method
Study		Graft Material			4HS		5HS		Graft Testing Method					Suture Method
Broadhead et al³ (2017)		Ovine flexor tendon			6		6		Uniaxial electromechanical load system					Suspensory fixation
Vaillant et al³³ (2017)		Cadaveric gracilis and semitendinosus tendon			8		8		DVRT					Krackow interlocking
Total		—			14		14		—					—

^a“Total” is reported as the weighted mean for all studies with “n” available at follow-up and considers the duplicated cohort in the 2 Krishna et al^18,19 studies. 4HS, 4-strand hamstring; 5HS, 5-strand hamstring; DVRT, differential variable reluctance transducer; NR, not reported.