Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 11;13(4):318–328. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2018.05.002

Table 3.

Distribution of defect scores according to tooth numbers in affected group.

Tooth number Defect score 16
26
36
46
11
12
21
22
31
32
41
42
n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%)
Enamel defect free 64 (29.8) 66 (30.7) 48 (22.3) 57 (26.5) 89 (41.4) 176 (81.9) 96 (44.7) 182 (84.6) 141 (65.6) 169 (78.6) 153 (71.2) 180 (83.7)
White/creamy opacities 55 (25.6) 46 (21.4) 48 (22.3) 44 (20.5) 75 (34.8) 26 (12.1) 78 (36.3) 22 (10.2) 56 (26) 31 (14.5) 43 (20) 22 (10.2)
Yellow/brown opacities 9 (4) 9 (4.2) 5 (2.3) 4 (1.9) 40 (18.6) 11 (5) 28 (13) 9 (4.2) 15 (7.0) 13 (6.0) 16 (7.4) 11 (5.2)
Slight tooth structure loss 18 (8.4) 18 (8.4) 13 (6.0) 17 (7.9) 6 (2.8) 1 (0.5) 8 (3.7) 1 (0.5) 3 (1.4) 2 (0.9) 2 (0.9) 2 (0.9)
Mild tooth structure loss 10 (4.7) 15 (7.0) 17 (7.9) 10 (4.7) 1 (0.5) 1 (0.5) 1 (0.5) 1 (0.5) 0 0 0 0
Severe tooth structure loss 20 (9.3) 24 (11) 33 (15.4) 30 (14.0) 1 (0.5) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Amalgam restorations 27 (12.6) 221 (9.8) 33 (15.4) 35 (16.3) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Composite restorations 9 (4.2) 12 (5.6) 13 (6.1) 11 (5) 3 (1.4) 0 4 (1.8) 0 0 0 1 (0.5) 0
Glass ionomer restorations 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Crown restorations 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Missing because of MIH 3 (1.4) 4 (1.9) 5 (2.3) 7 (3.2) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 215 (100) 215 (100) 215 (100) 215 (100) 215 (100) 215 (100) 215 (100) 215 (100) 215 (100) 215 (100) 215 (100) 215 (100)