Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 24;2018(1):CD006649. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006649.pub7

Prandoni 2004 (GALILEI).

Methods Randomized controlled trial.
Participants 156 people with cancer (study subgroup) with DVT of lower extremities, PE, or both; minimum age 18 years; minimum life expectancy 3 months.
Interventions Intervention: nadroparin 80 U/kg twice daily.
Control: UFH 1st dose weight adjusted IV, subsequent doses SC twice daily (target aPTT 50‐90 s) x 5 days.
Warfarin (target INR 2‐3) started the first 2 days x 12 weeks.
Discontinued treatment: not reported for cancer subgroup.
Outcomes Duration of follow‐up: 3 months.
  • Mortality.

  • Symptomatic recurrent VTE.

  • Major bleeding.


Screening and diagnostic testing for DVT: venogram, compression ultrasound.
Screening and diagnostic testing for PE: pulmonary angiography or computed tomographic scan.
Notes
  • Setting: not reported.

  • Funding: Gentium SpA, Como, Italy.

  • Ethical approval: "The study was approved by the ethical board of all participating centers."

  • Conflict of interest: "The Writing Committee for this article has no relevant financial interest in this article."

  • ITT analysis: "analyses were performed on an intention‐to‐treat basis."

Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "Randomization was performed with a computer algorithm."
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "Randomization was performed with a computer algorithm and the use of a 24 hour telephone service that recorded patient information before disclosure of the treatment assigned."
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Quote: "open multicenter clinical trial."
Comment: definitely not blinded; knowledge of the assigned intervention may have led to differential behaviors across intervention groups (e.g. differential dropout, differential cross‐over to an alternative intervention, or differential administration of cointerventions).
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Quote: "Information on all suspected outcome events and deaths was reviewed and classified by a central adjudication committee blinded to treatment assignment."
Comment: definitely blinded.
Incomplete outcome data addressed? Low risk Complete follow‐up.
Free of selective reporting? Low risk Study not registered and no published protocol identified. All relevant outcomes listed in the methods section were reported on in the results section.
Free of other bias? Low risk Study not reported as stopped early for benefit.
No other bias suspected.