Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Exp Eye Res. 2018 Dec 10;180:63–74. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2018.11.020

Table 1:

Lamb Pugh parameters of the a-wave in response to a 1.4 log cd.s/m2 flash stimulus at 2 weeks of diabetes.

RmP3 (uV) S (msec−2(cd.s/m2)−1) td (msec)
IR flox CNTL −580.02 ± 113.22 0.030 ± 0.007 2.53 ± 0.17
STZ −714.76 ± 167.76 0.023 ± 0.003 2.66 ± 0.25
Best1-cre CNTL −579.57 ± 223.07 0.026 ± 0.013 2.53 ± 0.20
STZ −644.60 ± 167.94 0.023 ± 0.009 2.62 ± 0.25
RPEIRKO CNTL −611.36± 125.38 0.029 ± 0.008 2.44 ± 0.17
STZ −444.77 ± 93.08*,#,† 0.026 ± 0.008 2.63 ± 0.20
*

p<0.05, RPEIRKO STZ vs RPEIRKO CNTL;

#

p<0.05 RPEIRKO STZ vs BEST1-cre STZ;

†

p<0.001 RPEIRKO STZ vs IR flox STZ.