Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 5;68(1):113–124. doi: 10.1538/expanim.18-0078

Table 2. Changes in the time spent and distance travelled between Empty Zone 1 and Holding Zone 1 and between Empty Zone 2 and Holding Zone 2 in both the control and stressed groups during the social novelty preference test.

Groups Parameters Social Chamber Novelty Chamber


EZ1 HZ1 *P-value EZ2 HZ2 *P-value
Control (n=7) Time Spent 15.057 83.914 0.003 23.743 139.271 0.004
Distance Travelled 1.145 4.99 0.009 1.67 7.069 0.018
Stress (n=7) Time Spent 24.757 59.829 0.005 29.843 132.371 <0.001
Distance Travelled 1.123 2.948 0.001 1.876 5.761 <0.001

Both the control and stressed groups spent more time and travelled a longer distances in Holding Zones (HZ1, HZ2) than Empty Zones (EZ1, EZ2). *P<0.05 is significant. The two-tails t-test was performed with the assumption of unequal variances. Abbreviations. EZ, Empty Zone; HZ, Holding Zone; n, number of samples.