Table 6.
Comparison of the catalytic activity of cooper-carbon catalysts with others heterogeneous copper-based catalytic systems.
![]() | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | Catalyst | Time (h) | Cat. loading (mol %) | Temperature/solvent | Number of cycle | Yield (%) | Reference |
| 1 | Cu-CC | 6 | 1 | r.t./water | 10 | 98 | This work |
| 2 | Cu-CANS | 6 | 1 | r.t./water | 10 | 98 | |
| 3 | Cu/C | 48 | 10 | 23°C/dioxane | – | 65 | Lipshutz and Taft, 2006 |
| 4 | Cu2O/C | 2 | 5 | r.t./i-PrOH:H2O | 3 | 82 | López-Ruiz et al., 2012 |
| 5 | TRGO/Cu | 48 | 2 | 40°C/THF | 4 | 99 | Shaygan Nia et al., 2014 |
| 6 | Cu-Alginate | 18 | 21 | r.t./water | 3 | 98 | Rajender Reddy et al., 2007 |
| 7 | Cu-Chitosan | 6 | 10 | r.t./water | 5 | 90 | Anil Kumar et al., 2015 |
| 8 | Cu-Hydroxyappatite | 16 | 5 | 50°C/water | 8 | 95 | Masuyama et al., 2011 |
| 9 | Cu-zeolite | 15 | 10 | r.t./toluene | 5 | 83 | Chassaing et al., 2007 |
