TABLE 3.
Regression analyses for dietary components explaining variability in risk factors for metabolic syndrome1
| Waist circumference | Systolic blood pressure | Diastolic blood pressure | Glucose | HDL | TG | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | ΔR2 | β | ΔR2 | β | ΔR2 | β | ΔR2 | β | ΔR2 | β | ΔR2 | |
| Step 1 | 0.68* | 0.18* | 0.17* | 0.08 | 0.11* | 0.22* | ||||||
| Age | 0.01 | 0.07 | 0.06 | −0.02 | −0.02 | 0.12 | ||||||
| Sex | −0.03 | 0.28* | 0.04 | 0.14 | −0.18* | 0.11 | ||||||
| Visceral adipose tissue | 0.80* | 0.24* | 0.29* | 0.01 | 0.30 | 0.41* | ||||||
| Added sugars | 0.04 | 0.10 | 0.15 | 0.08 | −0.06 | −0.07 | ||||||
| SFA, % | 0.06 | 0.00 | −0.09 | −0.23 | −0.05 | 0.05 | ||||||
| PUFA, % | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.05 | −0.03 | 0.04 | −0.05 | ||||||
| MUFA, % | −0.07 | −0.19 | −0.06 | −0.23 | −0.05 | 0.02 | ||||||
| Step 2 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.03* | ||||||
| Insoluble fiber | −0.03 | −0.03 | −0.11 | −0.13 | −0.08 | −0.17† | ||||||
| Step 2 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.04* | ||||||
| Soluble fiber | 0.08 | 0.12 | −0.01 | −0.11 | 0.03 | −0.23* | ||||||
| Step 2 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.03* | ||||||
| Total fiber | 0.06 | 0.01 | −0.09 | −0.15 | −0.04 | −0.21* | ||||||
Linear regression analyses were used to determine β and R2 estimates for metabolic syndrome risk factors and dietary factors at significance levels of *P < 0.05 and †P < 0.1. Females were assigned the reference group in the analysis.