Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 28;3(2):nzy094. doi: 10.1093/cdn/nzy094

TABLE 3.

Regression analyses for dietary components explaining variability in risk factors for metabolic syndrome1

Waist circumference Systolic blood pressure Diastolic blood pressure Glucose HDL TG
β ΔR2 β ΔR2 β ΔR2 β ΔR2 β ΔR2 β ΔR2
Step 1 0.68* 0.18* 0.17* 0.08 0.11* 0.22*
 Age 0.01 0.07 0.06 −0.02 −0.02 0.12
 Sex −0.03 0.28* 0.04 0.14 −0.18* 0.11
 Visceral adipose tissue 0.80* 0.24* 0.29* 0.01 0.30 0.41*
 Added sugars 0.04 0.10 0.15 0.08 −0.06 −0.07
 SFA, % 0.06 0.00 −0.09 −0.23 −0.05 0.05
 PUFA, % 0.06 0.07 0.05 −0.03 0.04 −0.05
 MUFA, % −0.07 −0.19 −0.06 −0.23 −0.05 0.02
Step 2 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.03*
 Insoluble fiber −0.03 −0.03 −0.11 −0.13 −0.08 −0.17
Step 2 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.04*
 Soluble fiber 0.08 0.12 −0.01 −0.11 0.03 −0.23*
Step 2 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.03*
 Total fiber 0.06 0.01 −0.09 −0.15 −0.04 −0.21*
1

Linear regression analyses were used to determine β and R2 estimates for metabolic syndrome risk factors and dietary factors at significance levels of *P < 0.05 and P < 0.1. Females were assigned the reference group in the analysis.