Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 25;9:6. doi: 10.1038/s41387-019-0073-1

Table 2.

Comparison of visceral fat area measured by DXA and CT

n DXA-VAT, cm2 CT-VAT, cm2 VAT difference (DXA–CT), cm2
HIV 313 133 ± 70 141 ± 101 −9 ± 47
 Women 106 110 ± 59 96 ± 64 14 ± 27
 Men 207 145 ± 72 165 ± 108 −20 ± 50
Non-HIV 144 116 ± 63 115 ± 84 1 ± 40
 Women 83 111 ± 63 96 ± 69 15 ± 29
 Men 61 122 ± 62 141 ± 95 −19 ± 44

VAT as measured by DEXA and CT, as well as the measurement difference between modalities, are presented as mean ±SD. CT computed tomography, DXA dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, VAT visceral fat cross-sectional area