Skip to main content
. 2017 May 9;34(5):511–519. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmx037

Table 3.

Comparison of effectiveness of short and long courses of antibiotics in adults

Condition (source systematic review) Primary Outcome Definition of short versus long courses (days) Studies (#) Patients (#) Relative effect of short compared to long duration (95%CI) Interpretation of summary risk statistic Duration of antibiotic course supported by results
Acute bacterial sinusitis (Falagas 2008(b)) Clinical cure/ success 3–7 versus 6–10 12 4430 0.95 (0.81, 1.12) OR > 1 supports short course No difference for short versus long
Non-pregnant women with uncomplicated UTI (Katchman, 2005) Symptomatic failure 3 versus ≥5 17 5029 0.99 (0.89, 1.10) RR > 1 supports long course No difference for short versus long
Acute pyelonephritis (Kyriakidou 2008) Clinical success 7–14 versus 14–42 2 185 1.03 (0.80, 1.32) OR > 1 supports short course No difference for short versus long
Community-acquired pneumonia (Li et al. 2007)a Clinical failure ≤7 versus >7 8 1540 0.96 (0.74, 1.26) RR > 1 supports long course No difference for short versus long
Acute uncomplicated lower UTI in older women (Lutters, 2008) Clinical failure 3–6 versus 7–14 4 395 0.98 (0.62, 1.54) RR > 1 supports long course No difference for short versus long

aFour additional studies were included in systematic review that compared IV antibiotics; therefore, they were excluded in our analyses.