Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Feb 26.
Published in final edited form as: J Urol. 2016 Aug 10;196(6):1700–1705. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.08.015

Table 2.

Univariate analysis of worse or improved symptoms after anterior urethroplasty

Worse Urgency Improved Urgency Worse Urge Incontinence Improved Urge Incontinence
OR p Value OR p Value OR p Value OR p Value
Age 1.00 0.94 0.98 0.05 1.06 0.01 0.92 <0.01
BMI 1.09 0.02 1.01 0.55 0.98 0.08 0.97 0.26
Urethroplasty:
 Buccal 1.03 0.97 0.70 0.50 0.79 0.72 0.85 0.89
 Augmented 0.58 0.72 0.93 0.91 1.00 0.99 0.33 0.40
 Excision + primary anastomosis 0.52 0.57 1.44 0.47 1.00 0.99 1.39 0.79
 Penile fasciocutaneous flap 1.00 0.99 3.71 0.18 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99
 Perineal urethrostomy 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99
 Combined approach 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99
Stricture location:
 Penile 2.59 0.18 2.00 0.25 1.00 0.99 1.46 0.70
 Bulbar 1.00 0.99 1.91 0.12 0.96 0.97 1.18 0.78
 Penobulbar 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99
Stricture length 0.99 0.94 0.96 0.34 0.94 0.64 1.03 0.71
Recurrence 1.00 0.99 0.24 0.03 3.20 0.17 0.51 0.48