Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Intell Manuf. 2016 Jun 9;30(1):79–95. doi: 10.1007/s10845-016-1228-8

Table 1.

PHM challenges.

Challenge
Diagnostics
  • Large sensitivity to signal noise, dependence on environmental and operating conditions, and lack of fault detection

  • Maintenance diagnosis is mainly a specialized process

  • Standard methods, guidelines, and trained personnel to fully verify and validate diagnostics are lacking

Prognostics
  • Failures are intermittent and hence difficult to predict with typical prediction methods

  • Lack of standards for the evaluation of prognostic algorithms

  • Methods for continuous real-time estimation of the RUL need development

  • Tools for PHM designers to know how PHM systems impact the total logistic system are lacking

  • Limits to the accuracy and precision of prognostics due to uncertainties

  • Multiple failures may complicate the prediction of RUL

Components and PHM Architecture
  • Difficulties exist for consistent data, communication, and security across a plant floor

  • Improvement in the relationship between controls engineering and maintenance engineering is needed

  • Lack of integration of PLC information and PHM capabilities

  • Deficient guidance to deal with abnormal events in complex systems and processes

  • Prognostics capability for electronics are lacking

Business Level
  • Maintenance is usually regarded as a net cost and not as a net benefit; it is difficult to quantify the cost savings due to PHM

Human Factors
  • Resistance due to culture, norms, expertise, and customer and supplier relationships

  • Creation of user-friendly PHM applications

  • Incorporation of subjective information from experienced workers/industry with faults