Table 3.

Model results predicting moderation of coping style in the relationship between stress and working memory

Analysis	Predictor	Regression coefficient	Standard error	t	P-value	Lower limit of 95% CI	Upper limit of 95% CI
Model 1	Education	0.391	0.104	7.069	0.000	0.530	0.940
	Course of disease	−0.107	0.039	−1.970	0.050	−0.155	0.000
	Negative symptoms	−0.131	0.044	−2.370	0.018	−0.191	−0.018
	Stress	−0.111	0.001	−1.959	0.051	−0.006	0.000
	Positive coping	−0.010	0.053	−0.177	0.860	−0.113	0.094
	Interaction term	0.016	0.000	0.291	0.772	0.000	0.001
Model 2	Education	0.390	0.110	6.700	0.000	0.519	0.951
	Course of disease	−0.100	0.039	−1.861	0.064	−0.149	0.004
	Negative symptoms	−0.120	0.044	−2.175	0.031	−0.182	−0.009
	Stress	−0.072	0.001	−1.215	0.225	−0.005	0.001
	Negative coping	0.013	0.046	0.226	0.821	−0.079	0.100
	Interaction term	−0.122	0.000	−2.116	0.035	−0.001	0.000

Notes: Stress measured by the Social Readjustment Rating Scale; positive coping and negative coping measured by the Simple Cope Style Questionnaire (SCSQ). Interaction term is the multiplied effects of stress and positive coping (Model 1) and stress and negative coping (Model 2).