Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Diabetes Educ. 2018 Dec 20;45(1):13–33. doi: 10.1177/0145721718819451

Table 1.

Study characteristics.

Study first author (year),
N
Attrition %
Study location Mean age (SD),
Sex %
Latino ancestrya Latino % in sample Study Design Control group Intervention dosage and duration
Castillo (2010)42
N = 70
Attrition: 33%
Chicago, IL
Age: 58.2 (13.1)
Female: 76%
NR
100% Latino
One group pre-post PS None Two-hour weekly group sessions for 10 weeks.
Heisler (2014)31
N = 188
Attrition: 6%
Detroit, MI Tx arm:
Age: 51 (8.6)
Female: 76%
Control:
Age: 52 (9.4)
Female: 66%
NR
57% Latino
RCT: One tx arm, one control group Comparison group had same amount of contact as tx group but used printed material Both groups: One individual 1.5–2 hour session, plus 2 phone sessions that took place between 3–6 weeks after initial session.
Tx group: Content was individually tailored and delivered in a digital format.
Lorig, (2000)43
N = 109
Attrition: 27%
Santa Clara, CA Age: 54.6 (12.3)
Female: 66%
NR
100% Latino
One group pre-post None Two-hour weekly group sessions for 6 weeks
Lorig (2008)32
6-month study
N = 417
Attrition: 16%
San Francisco, CA 6-mo. Study
Tx arm:
Age: 52.9 (13.2)
Female: 57%
Mexican
100% Latino
6-mo. study:
RCT: One tx arm, one control group
6-mo. study:
UC WL
6-month study:
2.5-hr weekly group sessions for 6 weeks (same curriculum as in the Lorig [2000]43 study).
18-month study
N = 387
Attrition: 22%
6-mo. study UC:
Age: 52.8 (13.4)
Female: 67%
18-mo. study
RCT: Two tx arms
18-mo. study:
Control participants completed the 6-mo tx arm, then no other tx
18-month study:
Intervention participants completed the 6-month tx arm, then received monthly automated reinforcement phone calls.
Mauldon (2006)44
N = 16
Attrition: 6%
Southern Connecticut Age median: 50
Female: 56%
Puerto Rican and Caribbean
100% Latino
One group pre-post PS None Three-hour weekly group sessions for 6 weeks.
McEwen (2010)45
N = 21
Attrition: 9%
Arizona border region Age: 53.7 (8.1)
Female: 81%
Mexican
100% Latino
One group pre-post PS None Two-hour monthly group sessions for 6 months, plus 3 individual 60–90 minute sessions within 3 weeks of each group session.
McEwen (2017)33
N b = 157
Attrition at 3 months: 29%
Arizona border region Age: 53.5 (9.0)
Female: 65%
Mexican
100% Latino
RCT: One tx arm, one control group WL + three weekly education classes Two-hour weekly group educational and social support sessions for 6 weeks, followed by 2-hour weekly home visits for 3 weeks, and 20-minute weekly phone calls for 3 weeks. Intervention was delivered to family dyads (participant with T2DM plus family member).
Moncrieft (2016)34
N c = 111
Attrition at 12 months: 22%
Miami, FL Age: 54.8 (7.4)
Female: 71%
NR
85% Latino
RCT: One tx arm, one control group UC + educational handouts Two individual sessions, followed by 2 weekly and 4 bi-weekly group sessions, followed by 9 monthly group sessions. All sessions lasted 1.5–2 hours.
Piette (2000)35
N = 280
Attrition: 11%
NR Tx arm:
Age: 55.7 (10.2)
Female: 61%
UC:
Age: 53.3 (10.5)
Female: 57%
NR
50% Latino
RCT: One tx arm, one control group UC One year of bi-weekly automated assessment telephone calls lasting 5–8 minutes with the option to listen to automated health information for 1–7 minutes. “Periodic” follow-up calls were conducted with a nurse based on urgency of reported problems.
Rosal (2005)36
N = 25
Attrition: 8%
Western MA Age: 62.6 (8.6)
Female: 80%
Puerto Rican
100% Latino
PS, RCT: One tx arm, one control group UC + educational handouts One 1-hour individual session, then 2.5–3.5 hour weekly group sessions for 10 weeks, plus two 15-minute individual sessions prior to each group session.
Tang (2014)37
N = 116
Attrition: 41%
Detroit, MI Age: 49.3 (11.0)
Female: 58.6%
Mexican
100% Latino
RCT: Two tx arms Comparison among two tx arms (no control group) Both tx arms:
Journey to Health DSME content delivered over 11 2-hour group sessions for 6 months, followed by two 1-hour monthly home visits, and 1 in-office visit with participant and their PCP.
Peer support tx arm: Optional weekly group sessions for an additional 12 months after the 6-month DSME.

CHW support tx arm: Monthly phone calls and emails on an as needed basis for an additional 12 months after the initial 6-month DSME.
Wagner (2016)38
N = 107
Attrition: 10%
Hartford, CT Age: 60.3 (11.6)
Female: 73%
NR
100% Latino
RCT: One tx arm, one control group UC + a onetime 2.5-hr group education session One 2.5-hour group education session, followed by eight 2-hour stress management weekly group sessions across 8–10 weeks.
Wang (2014)39
N = 252
Attrition: 7%
MA Age majority “middle aged”
Female: 76.6%
Puerto Rican
100% Latino
RCT: One tx arm, one control group UC One individual home visit for 1 hour, followed by weekly group sessions for 11 weeks, then 8 2.5-hour monthly group sessions.
Welch (2011)40
N = 46
Attrition: 15%
Springfield, MA Tx arm:
Age: 54.4 (10.4)
Female: 68%
Control:
Age: 57.5 (9.5)
Female: 62%
Puerto Rican
100% Latino
RCT: One tx arm, one control group UC + seven 1-hr education visits for 1 year using ADA DSME education booklets Seven 1-hour individual sessions over 1 year using a computerized program to guide the DSME discussion
Welch (2015)41
N = 399
Attrition: 12%
Western MA Age: 55.0 (11.1)
Female: 60%
NR
100% Latino
RCT: One tx arm, one control group UC in the clinic’s diabetes program + individual education visits with diabetes educators; frequency of visits depended on patient need One individual visit lasting 1 hour, followed by 30-minute visits occurring at week 2 and months 1, 3, and 6; all visits used a computerized program to guide the DSME discussions

Note. ADA = American Diabetes Association; CHW = community health worker; NR = not reported; PCP = primary care provider; Pre-post = a non-randomized prospective cohort study; PS = pilot study; RCT = randomized control trial; Tx = treatment; T2DM = Type 2 diabetes; UC = usual care control group, WL = waitlist control group

a

Latino ancestry defined as majority ancestry reported for sample or in area where sample was recruited from.

b

Participants with T2DM without counting their non-T2DM family member dyad.

c

Eligibility criteria for participants required a score of at least 11 on the Beck Depression Inventory-II.