Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Youth Adolesc. 2019 Jan 5;48(3):635–647. doi: 10.1007/s10964-018-00981-1

Table 3.

Model results for the impact of gender, racial group, parenting practices, maternal rumination, and maternal negative inferential style, on the negative and positive self-schema trajectories.

Negative Self-Schemas Positive Self-schemas
B SE p B SE p
Gender
Intercept 0.129 0.247 .601 0.257 0.116 .026*
Slope 0.049 0.068 .473 −0.046 0.030 .129
Racial Group
Intercept 0.182 0.273 .506 −0.105 0.116 .369
Slope −0.026 0.030 .396 0.025 0.032 .424
Involvement
Intercept 0.010 0.029 .716 −0.003 0.011 .767
Slope 0.006 0.003 .025* 0.001 0.003 .686
Lax Discipline
Intercept 0.039 0.072 .970 0.014 0.022 .517
Slope 0.005 0.005 .326 0.007 0.006 .269
Negative Control
Intercept −0.037 0.028 .186 −0.028 0.012 .018*
Slope −0.003 0.003 .293 0.005 0.003 .147
Rumination
Intercept −0.012 0.055 .832 −0.048 0.021 .019*
Slope 0.000 0.007 .962 0.004 0.005 .498
Negative Inferential Style
Intercept −0.136 0.161 .399 −0.003 0.065 .962
Slope −0.023 0.016 .157 0.022 0.018 .206

Note. Slope refers to the quadratic slope for negative self-schemas and the linear slope for positive self-schemas.

*

p < .05