Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 26;9:2752. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39308-w

Table 2.

Hierarchical AMOVA analysis considering the three genetic groups suggested by the haplotype distribution.

Variation source d.f. Sum of squares Variance component % of variation
Northern group vs. Central group vs. Southern group
Among groups 2 251.539 0.682 52.13
Among populations within groups 36 141.953 0.239 18.31
Within populations 540 208.820 0.387 29.56
Total 578 602.313 1.308
ΦCT = 0.52 (p < 0.001); ΦST = 0.70 (p < 0.001)
Northern group vs. Central-Southern groups
Among groups 1 124.357 0.703 45.25
Among populations within groups 37 269.135 0.464 29.86
Within population 540 208.820 0.387 24.90
Total 578 602.313 1.553
ΦCT = 0.45 (p < 0.001); ΦST = 0.75 (p < 0.001)
Northern group vs. Central group
Among groups 1 90.409 0.633 43.48
Among populations within groups 18 110.387 0.385 26.39
Within population 276 121.154 0.439 30.12
Total 295 321.949 1.457
ΦCT = 0.43 (p < 0.001); ΦST = 0.70 (p < 0.001)
Northern group vs. Southern group
Among groups 1 151.269 0.991 64.56
Among populations within groups 24 90.117 0.233 15.18
Within population 358 111.354 0.311 20.26
Total 383 352.740 1.535
ΦCT = 0.65 (p < 0.001); ΦST = 0.80 (p < 0.001)
Central group vs. Southern group
Among groups 1 127.182 0.539 48.44
Among populations within groups 30 83.402 0.158 14.24
Within population 446 185.133 0.415 37.32
Total 477 395.718 1.112
ΦCT = 0.48 (p < 0.001); ΦST = 0.63 (p < 0.001)

ΦCT = amount of differentiation among/between regions; ΦST = amount of differentiation among populations.