Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 6;8(3):239–251. doi: 10.1530/EC-18-0485

Table 1.

The comparison of clinicopathological factors between training cohort and validation cohort.

Characteristic N Patients P
Training cohort Validation cohort
Total 1966 1474 492
Age (years)
 ≤60 946 705 241 0.677
 >60 1020 769 251
Gender
 Male 1084 815 269 0.834
 Female 882 659 223
Surgery
 No 1695 1271 424 0.978
 Yes 271 203 68
Surgery
 No 1619 1215 404 0.964
 Recommended, but no 76 56 20
 Yes 271 203 68
Tumor site
 Head 883 655 228 0.775
 Body 300 231 69
 Tail 783 588 195
Tumor grade
 Well 700 513 197 0.646
 Moderate 396 305 91
 Poor 870 656 214
Tumor size (cm)
 ≤2 150 107 43 0.585
 2–4 702 526 176
 >4 1114 841 273
T stage (8th)
 I 56 39 17 0.725
 II 490 374 116
 III 1098 825 273
 IV 322 236 86
LN metastasis
 Absent 1058 785 273 0.476
 Present 908 689 219
Survival status
 Alive 497 372 125 0.952
 Dead 1469 1102 367
Survival status
 Alive 497 372 125 0.976
 Cancer-specific death 1398 1048 350
 Non-cancer-specific death 71 54 17

LN, lymph node.