Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Fertil Steril. 2018 Jun 13;110(1):27–34. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.03.009

Table 3.

Logistic regression models of association between insulin resistance and depression risk in PCOS

Model 1 Model 2 Model 3

Univariate OR (95% CI) p Multivariate OR (95% CI) p Multivariate OR (95% CI) p

Abnormal HOMA-IR 2.32 (1.28-4.21) <0.01 2.23 (1.11-4.46) 0.02 2.03 (1.00-4.16) 0.05

Age, yrs 0.92 (0.86-0.98) <0.01 0.92 (0.86-0.98) 0.01 0.95 (0.89-1.02) 0.18

BMI, kg/m2 1.02 (0.99-1.25) 0.14 1.00 (0.97-1.04) 0.84 1.00 (0.97-1.04) 0.89

Income
 <$25k Referent Referent
 $25k - $74,999 0.38 (0.19-0.75) <0.01 0.38 (0.19-0.77) <0.01
 ≥$75k 0.23 (0.09-0.61) <0.01 0.35 (0.13-0.94) 0.04
 Wish to not answer 0.69 (0.30-1.56) 0.30 0.67 (0.29-1.57) 0.36

Androstenedione, mg/dL 1.18 (1.03-1.34) 0.02 1.11 (0.93-1.33) 0.24

Total testosterone, mg/dL 1.01 (1.00-1.01) 0.16 1.00 (0.99-1.01) 0.74

Hirsute 2.38 (0.85-6.72) 0.10 2.04 (0.71-5.91) 0.19

Acne score 1.01 (1.00-1.02) 0.03 1.01 (1.00-1.02) 0.07

Total cholesterol, mg/dL 0.99 (0.99-1.00) 0.08 0.99 (0.99-1.00) 0.13

Model 1: unadjusted odds ratios

Model 2: controls for age and BMI, selected a priori

Model 3: includes all variables associated with depression risk at p<0.20 on univariate logistic regression analyses, while excluding select co-linear variables

HOMA-IR: Homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance, cut-off >2.2 considered elevated