Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2018 Dec;16(4):386–405. doi: 10.1007/s11938-018-0199-6

Table 1.

Endoscopic Devices Used in the Closure or Covering of Transmural Defects

Device/ Technique Mechanism of action Description Best Use Defect characteristics for success Advantage(s) Disadvange(s )
TTSC Closure Hemostatic clips used to approximate tissue.

Defect closure is off-label use, only the Resolution 360™ Clip (Boston Scientific, Natick, Mass) is FDA approved for this application.
Acute wall defect: perforation Location/distance from the entrance orifice: anywhere in the GI tract

Size: smaller than 1 to 2 cm)

Margin: non-everted regular edges

Tissue quality: healthy
Ease of application Limited to smaller defects and healthy tissue with regularmargins.
Cap mounted clips Closure Clips housed in distal attachment cap. Designed with internal prongs to approximate tissue for defect closure. Acute/Chronic wall defect: perforation, leak and fistulas Location/distance from the entrance orifice: anywhere in the GI tract

Size: smaller than 3 cm

Margin: non-everted or everted edges

Tissue quality: healthy
Ease of application Limited to smaller defects and healthy tissue.
Endoloop Closure Defects are approximated and sealed with endoloops alone or with clips.

Defect closure is off-label use.
Acute wall defect: perforation Location/distance from the entrance orifice: anywhere in the GI tract

Size: between 3 to 5 cm

Margin: non-everted or everted edges

Tissue quality: healthy
Cheaper device for larger defects Technically demanding

Limited evidence
Endoscopic sutures Closure Can be used for interrupted or running full-thickness tissue apposition to close wall defects. Acute/Chronic wall defect: perforation, leaks and fistulas Location/distance from the entrance orifice: best for esophagus, stomach and rectum. Can be done in duodenum and colon but is challenging.

Size: any size can be closed with the suture device

Margin: non-everted or everted edges

Tissue quality: healthy
Can be applied at complex wall defect Technically demanding

Not optimal for small spaces.

Requires a double-channel endoscope
Cardiac septal occluder Closure/ Covering Nitinol, dumbbell shaped occluder plug with polyethylene terephthalate sewn-in patch.

Defect closure is off-label use.
Chronic leaks and fistulas Location/distance from the entrance orifice: anywhere in the GI tract

Size: any size. You need to select the correct size of the device correlated to the defect size

Margin: non-everted or everted edges

Tissue quality: unhealthy (well-established fistula tract)
Ease of application Limited evidence

Expensive
Tissue sealants Closure/ Covering Can be used either by fistula embolization or Chronic fistula by submucosal injection into the edges of the fistula until the lumen is occluded. Other technique includes combining an absorbable mesh with a sealant application for larger fistula.

Better results when used in conjunction with other endoscopic techniques.
Chronic fistula Location/distance from the entrance orifice: anywhere in the GI tract

Size: most effective in long narrow fistula tract.

Margin: non-everted or everted edges

Tissue quality: unhealthy (well-established fistula tract)
Ease of application Rarely successful as mono-therapy

Multiple sessions required

Relatively expensive
Luminal Stents Covering Stent placement acts by covering the defect and diverting enteral contents. Acute wall defect: perforationand leaks Location/distance from the entrance orifice: best for esophagus and after bariatric surgery.

Size: any size that the stents can cover

Margin: non-everted

Tissue quality: healthy or unhealthy
Ease of application

Better results in upper GI tract
Only can be used in narrow lumens.

Fully covered has higher chance of migration (should fixed in place)

Partially covered can be difficult to remove