Table 1.
Device/ Technique | Mechanism of action | Description | Best Use | Defect characteristics for success | Advantage(s) | Disadvange(s ) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTSC | Closure | Hemostatic clips used to approximate tissue. Defect closure is off-label use, only the Resolution 360™ Clip (Boston Scientific, Natick, Mass) is FDA approved for this application. |
Acute wall defect: perforation | Location/distance from the entrance orifice: anywhere in the GI tract Size: smaller than 1 to 2 cm) Margin: non-everted regular edges Tissue quality: healthy |
Ease of application | Limited to smaller defects and healthy tissue with regularmargins. |
Cap mounted clips | Closure | Clips housed in distal attachment cap. Designed with internal prongs to approximate tissue for defect closure. | Acute/Chronic wall defect: perforation, leak and fistulas | Location/distance from the entrance orifice: anywhere in the GI tract Size: smaller than 3 cm Margin: non-everted or everted edges Tissue quality: healthy |
Ease of application | Limited to smaller defects and healthy tissue. |
Endoloop | Closure | Defects are approximated and sealed with endoloops alone or with clips. Defect closure is off-label use. |
Acute wall defect: perforation | Location/distance from the entrance orifice: anywhere in the GI tract Size: between 3 to 5 cm Margin: non-everted or everted edges Tissue quality: healthy |
Cheaper device for larger defects | Technically demanding Limited evidence |
Endoscopic sutures | Closure | Can be used for interrupted or running full-thickness tissue apposition to close wall defects. | Acute/Chronic wall defect: perforation, leaks and fistulas | Location/distance from the entrance orifice: best for esophagus, stomach and rectum. Can be done in duodenum and colon but is challenging. Size: any size can be closed with the suture device Margin: non-everted or everted edges Tissue quality: healthy |
Can be applied at complex wall defect | Technically demanding Not optimal for small spaces. Requires a double-channel endoscope |
Cardiac septal occluder | Closure/ Covering | Nitinol, dumbbell shaped occluder plug with polyethylene terephthalate sewn-in patch. Defect closure is off-label use. |
Chronic leaks and fistulas | Location/distance from the entrance orifice: anywhere in the GI tract Size: any size. You need to select the correct size of the device correlated to the defect size Margin: non-everted or everted edges Tissue quality: unhealthy (well-established fistula tract) |
Ease of application | Limited evidence Expensive |
Tissue sealants | Closure/ Covering | Can be used either by fistula embolization or Chronic fistula by submucosal injection into the edges of the fistula until the lumen is occluded. Other technique includes combining an absorbable mesh with a sealant application for larger fistula. Better results when used in conjunction with other endoscopic techniques. |
Chronic fistula | Location/distance from the entrance orifice: anywhere in the GI tract Size: most effective in long narrow fistula tract. Margin: non-everted or everted edges Tissue quality: unhealthy (well-established fistula tract) |
Ease of application | Rarely successful as mono-therapy Multiple sessions required Relatively expensive |
Luminal Stents | Covering | Stent placement acts by covering the defect and diverting enteral contents. | Acute wall defect: perforationand leaks | Location/distance from the entrance orifice: best for esophagus and after bariatric surgery. Size: any size that the stents can cover Margin: non-everted Tissue quality: healthy or unhealthy |
Ease of application Better results in upper GI tract |
Only can be used in narrow lumens. Fully covered has higher chance of migration (should fixed in place) Partially covered can be difficult to remove |