Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2018 Aug 30;38(2):585–595. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2018.2867837

TABLE IV.

Quantitative comparisons of DSC and ASD (mm) for segmentations of three pelvic organs (i.e., prostate, bladder, rectum) on the planning CT images of 313 patients. (The best results are indicated in bold)

Methods Prostate Bladder Rectum

DSC ASD DSC ASD DSC ASD

Martinez [33] 0.87 ± 0.07 - 0.89 ± 0.08 - 0.82 ± 0.06 -
Lay [16] - 3.57 ± 2.01 - 3.08 ± 2.25 - 3.97 ± 1.43
Lu [34] - 2.37 ± 0.89 - 2.81 ± 1.86 - 4.23 ± 1.46
Shao [8] 0.88 ± 0.02 1.86 ± 0.21 0.86 ± 0.05 2.22 ± 1.01 0.84 ± 0.04 2.21 ± 0.50
Gao [35] 0.86 ± 0.05 1.85 ± 0.74 0.91 ± 0.10 1.71 ± 3.74 0.79 ± 0.20 2.13 ± 2.97
Gao [9] 0.87 ± 0.04 1.77 ± 0.66 0.92 ± 0.05 1.37 ± 0.82 0.88 ± 0.05 1.38 ± 0.75

Seg-noCur 0.79 ± 0.07 2.65 ± 1.54 0.88 ± 0.08 2.28 ± 1.20 0.75 ± 0.11 4.02 ± 2.03
Proposed 0.89 ± 0.02 1.34 ± 0.64 0.94 ± 0.03 0.94 ± 0.76 0.89 ± 0.05 1.38 ± 1.63