Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Feb 27.
Published in final edited form as: Nucl Receptor Res. 2018 Aug 9;5:101377. doi: 10.11131/2018/101377

Regulation of Microbiota by Vitamin D Receptor: A Nuclear Weapon in Metabolic Diseases

Danika Bakke 1,#, Ishita Chatterjee 1,#, Annika Agrawal 1,2, Yang Dai 3, Jun Sun 1
PMCID: PMC6392192  NIHMSID: NIHMS984995  PMID: 30828578

Abstract

Metabolic syndrome is a multi-faceted disease. The microbiota, as a newly discovered organ, contributes to the pathogenesis and progression of metabolic syndrome. Recent studies have demonstrated that nuclear receptors play critical roles in metabolic diseases. In the current review, we discuss the general role of the microbiome in health and metabolic syndrome. We summarize the functions of the nuclear receptor vitamin D receptor (VDR) in metabolism. The focus of this review is the novel roles of vitamin D/VDR signaling in regulating inflammation and the microbiome, especially in obesity. Furthermore, we extend our discussion of potential gut-liver axis mediated by VDR signaling and microbiota in obesity. Finally, we discuss the potential clinical application of probiotics and fecal microbiota transplantation in prevention and treatment of metabolic syndrome. Insights into nuclear receptors in metabolism and metabolic diseases will allow us to develop new strategies for fighting metabolic diseases.

Keywords: Inflammation, infection, bacteria, probiotics, FMT, microbiome, nuclear receptor

1. Introduction

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a challenging medical problem characterized by the association of insulin resistance (IR)/type 2 diabetes (T2DM), hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and abdominal obesity [1]. Obesity can induce chronic, low grade inflammation in adipose and other tissues, which promotes insulin resistance. The important risk factors for MetS are diet, genetics, aging, stress, sedentary behavior or low physical activity, disrupted chronobiology/sleep, mood disorders/psychotropic medication use, and excessive alcohol use. The increasing prevalence of obesity and its role in contributing to cardiovascular disease (CVD) and T2DM are fueling interest in MetS. Lifestyle changes to improve diet and exercise or gastric bypass surgery can reduce obesity and improve insulin resistance [2]. However, MetS is a multi-faceted disease, and there is no one ‘gold standard’ treatment option.

Gut bacteria have been implicated as critical regulators of host metabolism [3]. Gut microbial dysbiosis is emerging as one of the crucial risk factors for developing obesity, atherosclerosis, CVD, T2DM, and MetS [411]. Recent studies in both genetic and diet-induced animal models of obesity have shown that imbalance in the microbiota is related to an increased Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes phyla ratio [12, 13]. The bacteria Clostridium coccoides, Lactobacillus reuteri, Akkermansia muciniphila, Clostridium histolyticum, and Staphylococcus aureus are altered in obesity [14, 15]. The impact of the gut microbiota on host metabolism makes it a potentially viable target for treating MetS.

In the current review, we will discuss the general role of the microbiome in health and MetS, focusing on the role of the nuclear receptor vitamin D receptor in this interaction.

2. Vitamin D and VDR in Metabolism

1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (l,25(OH)2D3), the active form of vitamin D, is generated in the skin after exposure to UV light or absorbed from a diet of vitamin D-rich foods. l,25(OH)2D3acts primarily through its receptor VDR. VDR is a nuclear receptor and transcription factor that directly or indirectly regulates over 900 genes [16]. VDR mediates most known functions of l,25(OH)2D3. Once VDR binds with l,25(OH)2D3,VDR heterodimerizes with the retinoid X receptor (RXR). Activated VDR then binds to the vitamin D-response element (VDRE) in the target gene promoter to regulate gene transcription. VDR is expressed in a variety of tissues, including the intestines, adipose, and liver (https://www.proteinatlas.org) [17], and modulates metabolic and immune system processes [1822].

VDR is a critical regulator of host metabolic health. Low levels of vitamin D or inactivating polymorphisms in VDR have been associated with inflammatory and metabolic disorders [2330]. Vitamin D deficiency causes rickets, characterized by hypoparathyroidism and impaired bone mineralization. Results from studies on mice given vitamin D-deficient diets and Vdr knockout (‘Vdr−/−mice) mice show the importance of vitamin D/VDR in health [20, 3134]. Vitamin D-deficiency or loss of VDR results in inflammation, impaired adiposity, and weakened bones. Vitamin D regulates bone development and calcium homeostasis through its actions in the intestine, kidney, and bone. Vitamin D regulates calcium absorption in the intestine and resorption in the kidney by activating transcellular calcium transport, and intestine-specific Vdr knockout mice (VDRΔIEC) exhibit reduced calcium absorption [35].

VDR promotes cellular health by regulating autophagy. Autophagy is critical in maintaining cellular health and protecting cells from apoptosis by degrading malfunctioning organelles and invasive bacteria. During cellular starvation, autophagy is activated to break down organelles and cell components to release needed nutrients. The protein ATG16L1 mediates autophagosome formation and is transcriptionally regulated directly by VDR. Loss of ATG16L1 or VDR expression impairs autophagy, resulting in cellular dysfunction, and has been associated with intestinal dysbiosis and inflammatory diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [31,36].

3. Gut Microbiome Greatly Affects Host Metabolism

The gut microbiome has the metabolic functions to provide the host with energy through fermentation. Bacteria break down carbohydrates indigestible by the host to increase nutrient absorption. There are several hypotheses regarding how gut microbial imbalance contributes to obesity, and many studies suggest dysbiosis in the gut microbiota causes disequilibrium in energy homeostasis that eventually leads to obesity [3739]. Regardless, obesity, IR and MetS result as a consequence of complex interaction between immune and microbial factors with the host genetic factors [40]. Studies in both humans and mice indicate that decreased short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) significantly contribute to the development of obesity [4144]. Furthermore, increased levels of the bacterial endotoxin lipopolysaccharide (LPS) can promote low-grade inflammation associated with increased IR, obesity and MetS [4547]. An abnormal increase in gram-negative bacteria, including Enterobacter cloacae, is associated with high levels of LPS in obesity [48]. In support, another report showed that mice fed the obesogenic ‘Western’ diet, containing high fat and low fiber, exhibit significantly increased levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6 and endotoxemia marker LPS binding protein (LBP) in plasma. These effects were diminished remarkably after the obese mice were treated with antibiotics to suppress their gut microbiota [49]. Additionally, dysbiosis can contribute to the development of obesity by altering the production of gastrointestinal peptides related to satiety, resulting in an increased food intake and progression of disease state [50]. Interestingly, in mice, many of these metabolic disease phenotypes are transferable via feces [51]. These findings strongly implicate the vital role of microbiota in both development and advancement of metabolic conditions [52].

Microbial metabolites, including SCFAs and secondary bile acids, are taken up and affect host physiology beyond the intestine. Secondary bile acids directly stimulate host receptors farsenoid X receptor (FXR), Takeda G-protein-coupled receptor 5 (TGR5), and VDR in the intestine and liver [53]. One microbial metabolite, trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO), is associated with diet-induced weight gain, CVD, and T2DM [54, 56, 57]. ‘Western’ diet fed mice develop an altered microbiota composition along with obesity. An obesogenic diet causes loss of microbial diversity, increased Firmicutes and Proteobacteria, and decreased Bacteroidetes populations; this diet-induced shift in the microbiome is sufficient to cause obesity. Transfer of the ‘obese’ microbiome to lean, germ-free animals induced weight gain in the recipients [40,58]. Dietary emulsifiers and artificial preservatives and sweeteners in processed food also contribute to dysbiosis and insulin resistance. Studies by Chassaing et al have found that obese individuals have increased microbial encroachment on the host epithelium, contributing to chronic, lowgrade inflammation and insulin resistance [57, 59]. A high fat diet alters the gut microbiota and increases bacterial LPS production and intestinal permeability, promoting inflammation, dysbiosis, and insulin resistance. These studies show that the microbiota mediates diet-induced obesity and contributes to metabolic syndrome.

Technological advances in bacterial sequencing have led to the exciting discovery that bacteria can mediate the metabolic benefits of interventions for obesity. An intriguing aspect of bariatric surgery is that insulin sensitivity improves before any significant weight loss is observed. Tremaroli et al have found that surgery leads to alterations in the gut microbiome that mediate at least some of the benefit of bariatric surgery [60]. Similarly, oral supplementation of the T2DM drug metformin is superior to injection partly because the drug is metabolized by gut bacteria [61]. Fecal microbiome transfer from healthy patients has been used to treat Clostridium difficile infection, but it has been observed that the metabolic profile of the donor can be unintentionally transmitted to the recipient [58]. These studies emphasize the critical role of the microbiome in regulating host metabolic health. This makes gut microbial modulation an attractive target in the development of treatments for obesity and metabolic disease.

4. VDR Regulation of Microbiome and Inflammation

Cross talk between the gut microbiome and VDR signaling affects host responses and inflammation. We have found that intestinal VDR expression regulates the host microbiome and mediates the anti-inflammatory effects of probiotics [31, 62]. Mice with intestine-specific loss of VDR expression are more susceptible to chemical models of colitis [31, 63]. Vdr−/− mice are more susceptible to autoimmune diseases and have impaired differentiation of two subsets of regulatory T cells (invariant NKT and CD8αα/TCRαβ T cells) [64]. VDR signaling also promotes mucosal barrier function in the gut. Expression of the barrier protein claudin 2 is transcriptionally regulated by VDR [65]. Secretion of anti-microbial peptides such as cathelicidin and β-defensins is critical in preventing contact of gut microbes with the epithelial surface, and expression of both these AMPs is regulated by VDR [66].

VDR expression and activity in immune cells promotes tolerogenic and anti-inflammatory phenotypes. Exposing pro-inflammatory T cells from ulcerative patients to a VDR agonist is sufficient to convert them to tolerogenic regulator T cells (Tregs) [67]. Dendritic cell treated with vitamin D exhibit a tolerogenic phenotype and promote induction of Tregs [68, 69]. VDR also influences intestinal inflammation through its interaction with NF-κΒ. VDR promotes NF-κB expression but reduces intestinal inflammation by blocking NF-κΒ signaling and nuclear translocation. Loss of VDR results in loss of physical binding of NF-κBp65, reducing the level of IkappaBalpha protein, and increased transcriptional activity of NF-κB [7073]. Interaction of VDR with NF-κΒ in macrophages suppresses the pro-inflammatory response to the bacterial endotoxin LPS [74]. Genome-wide association studies have implicated the Vdr gene as a mediator of inflammatory disease. A recent study found that numerous SNPs correlated with immune disorders represent binding sites for VDR and NF-κΒ, and suggests that VDR may regulate transcription indirectly through its interaction with NF-κB [75]. These data suggest the critical role of VDR in barrier functions, innate immunity and adaptive immunity.

A recent study found the direct correlation between low vitamin D levels and glucose metabolism [76]. Dietary changes (e.g., vitamin D supplementation) may reduce inflammation and ameliorate impaired insulin signaling and secretion process [76]. Vitamin D/VDR helps in maintaining healthy intestinal microbiome, thus improving glucose homeostasis in diabetes [62]. Patients with T2DM exhibit dysbiosis, and studies suggest that the microbiota plays a causative role in development of glucose intolerance and modulating the microbiota can improve glucose sensitivity [77]. VDR is a regulator of the microbiome and is also known to regulate the expression of AMPs and autophagy regulator Atgl611 [22, 31]. which are essential for microbial and intestinal homeostasis. Vdr−/− mice exhibit a significant shift in the phylogenetic content of gut microbiota from their control group, including a 42% variation in β-diversity. In a human study, the shift in the microbiota was correlated with serum levels of specific bile and fatty acids, including known ligands and downstream metabolites of VDR [78]. Fecal content of Vdr−/− mice shows increased Clostridium and Bacteroides populations, whereas Lactobacillus is depleted. In the ceacal content, Alistipes and Odoribacter were depleted, and Eggerthella was enriched [62]. Analysis of both human and mice gut microbiota indicated that VDR influences individual bacterial taxa such as Parabacteroides, which is associated with diabetes [78]. However, studies of dysbiosis and VDR in disease models are still limited. Apart from obesity and metabolic syndrome, decreased vitamin D and downregulation of VDR are also linked with the pathogenesis of several diseases associated with microbial dysbiosis, namely IBD [7981]. cancer asthma [82, 83].

5. Role of Vitamin D/VDR in Obesity

Low serum vitamin D is correlated with obesity and insulin resistance [21], and many studies have identified roles for VDR in regulating metabolism. Vdr−/− mice exhibit a lean phenotype and resist high fat diet-induced weight gain, including increased uncoupling protein 1 (UCP1) expression in white adipose depots resulting in energy wasting rather than storage [84]. These adipocytes, with induced UPC1 activity, increased mitochondria, and smaller lipid droplets are commonly referred to as ‘beige’ adipocytes, as they occur in white adipose depots and differentiate from white adipocyte precursors but develop brown adipocyte properties. Induction of white adipocyte trans-differentiation into metabolically active beige adipocytes is an attractive target in anti-obesity therapeutics, and loss of VDR signaling appears to be a contributing factor. On the other hand, mice with transgenic overexpression of human Vdr in adipocytes have increased weight gain and adiposity and decreased UCP1 expression compared to controls. Interestingly, adipocyte-specific Vdr knockout mice do not develop the lean phenotype observed in whole body knockout mice, suggesting that the lean phenotype is mediated by VDR signaling in other tissues, such as the intestine or liver, or caused by poor nutritional state due to impaired intestinal nutrient absorption [85]. This also indicates that vitamin D/VDR studies should include tissuespecific models.

Although total loss of VDR promotes leanness, activation of VDR signaling in the immune system may improve insulin resistance and cardiovascular aspects of MetS, including atherosclerosis. During obesity, macrophages infiltrate adipose tissue, which creates a chronically inflamed environment contributing to insulin resistance. VDR signaling in macrophages regulates their phenotype and loss of myeloid VDR promotes insulin resistance and cardiovascular disease [20]. Vitamin D deficiency exacerbates macrophage infiltration of adipose tissue and promotes inflammatory cytokine release in high fat diet fed rats. This phenotype is mediated by decreased expression of AMPK and SIRT1, key nutrient sensors that regulate adipogenesis, lipid storage, and inflammation [86]. Thus, the overall effect of low vitamin D/VDR activation is increased susceptibility to obesity and associated diseases.

In macrophages, VDR is post-translationally regulated by blood glucose levels. VDR is OGlcNAcylated in response to hyperglycemia [87]. Whether this post-translational modification occurs in other obesity related organs such as adipose tissue, pancreas, or skeletal muscle and what downstream effect it may have on insulin sensitivity has yet to be determined. However, phosphorylation and SUMOylation of VDR influences its transcriptional activity [88]. Thus, further study regarding how VDR responds to blood glucose levels in the immune system and metabolic tissues is warranted [88]. These studies should be done in a tissue specific experimental model to avoid the confounding changes in the whole body knockout mice.

6. Potential Gut-Liver Axis through VDR and Microbiota in Obesity

VDR, as a transcription factor, heterodimerizes with the retinoid X receptor (RXR) and regulates a range of physiological functions [89]. It may mediate the effects of the host microbiota by serving as a bile acid sensor [53]. VDR is activated by binding to either the potent vitamin D metabolite 1,25(OH)2D3 or secondary bile acids transformed by gut microbial metabolism, such as lithocholic acid (LCA), glycine-conjugated LCA, and 3-keto-LCA from 7α-dehydroxylated primary CDCAA [90]. When activated, VDR directly enhances the transcription of cytochrome P450 enzyme CYP3A4 in hepatic cells. CYP3A4 initiates the metabolic degradation of LCA and ultimately reduces the bile acid concentration, thus preventing bile acid toxicity (Figure 1). In the liver, after VDR is activated by l,25(OH)2D or LCA, it then heterodimerizes with FXR/RXR and binds to VDR responsive element (VDRE) region of DNA. VDR activation decreases bile acid synthesis. Thus, VDR acts as a bile acid sensor. Recently, Ishizawa et al. found that, like l,25(OH)2D3, LCA can also effectively increased the expression of target gene Cyp24a1 in the ileum, thus indicating that LCA is a selective VDR ligand acting mainly in the lower intestine. Correspondingly, LCA may be involved in signaling that interlinks intestinal bacteria and host VDR function [91]. VDR activation also creates a negative feedback loop by decreasing bile acid synthesis, mediated by reduced CYP7A1 expression (Figure 1). In male Sprague-Dawley rats, VDR has been shown to induce apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter (Asbt) expression, which increases ileal bile acid transport [92].

Figure 1: VDR regulates the liver-gut axis:

Figure 1:

In the liver, after VDR is activated by l,25(OH)2D or LCA, it then heterodimerizes with FXR/RXR and binds to VDR responsive element (VDRE) region of DNA. Active VDR directly increases CYP3A4 transcription, which in turn degrades LCA. VDR activation also induces negative regulation of CYP7A1, which decreases bile acid synthesis. Thus, VDR acts as a bile acid sensor. In the intestine, VDR regulates the intestinal barrier functions by regulating epithelial tight junction proteins and blocking inflammation and bacterial infection. Thus, VDR plays a major role in linking the signaling pathways that moderate the liver-gut axis. Dysregulation of this axis might lead to increased gut permeability, bacterial translocation, and obesity.

As shown in Figure 1, in the intestine, VDR regulates the intestinal barrier functions by regulating epithelial tight junction proteins and blocking inflammation and bacterial infection. Thus, VDR plays a major role in linking the signaling pathways that moderate the liver-gut axis. Activation of VDR has multiple effects on bile acid metabolism, transport and absorption. VDR activation also directly interferes with the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines [93]. Dysregulation of vitamin D/VDR might lead to increased gut permeability, bacterial translocation, and obesity.

The Vitamin D/VDR axis plays a crucial role in obesity, which is at least partially mediated by gene polymorphisms and inflammation [94]. Results of a genome-wide association analysis of a Northern Germany cohort involving 1,812 human subjects suggest that the Vdr gene is significantly associated with overall microbial variation and individual taxa [78]. VDR regulates not only gut microbes but also several important host pathways, such as nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like receptors (NLRs), amino acid and carbohydrate metabolism, detoxification, infection, and signal transduction and influences cancer and other diseases [62]. A recent study of 103 pediatric patients in the UK showed that polymorphisms in the vitamin D metabolic pathway are associated with increased steatosis and severity of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Additionally, this NAFLD patient cohort exhibited decreased vitamin D status year-round with extremely low levels in the winter season [95].

A growing body of evidence suggests that microbiota-bile acid interactions play a role in the development of obesity and several other metabolic disorders [11, 96, 97]. Thus, the crosstalk between intestinal VDR signaling and gut microbiota may hold the key for how VDR signaling in non-adipose tissues can contribute to obesity and metabolic syndrome. Thus, a gut-liver axis mediated by VDR may play a novel role in obesity and metabolic diseases (Figure 1).

7. Potential Clinical Application of Probiotics and FMT in Prevention and Treatment of Metabolic Syndrome

Lately, targeting the microbiome to combat obesity and metabolic syndrome has gathered much attention. To modify the microbiome and modulate pathogenic bacterial species, prebiotics [98], probiotics [99], phage therapy [100] and CRISPR/cas [101] systems are evolving as advanced tools.

Several studies have indicated that administration of probiotics has clinical benefits in improving the symptoms of metabolic syndrome. Probiotics can promote restoration of gut microbiome composition by introducing live bacteria or bioactive metabolites [102, 103]. They also known to alter various metabolic pathway outcomes, most importantly, amino-acid metabolism, methylamines and SCFAs, suggesting differences in fermentation patterns [83]. Table 1 and Table 2 summarize the effect of probiotic bacteria in obesity in both mice and humans. Lactobacillus gasseri, L. salivarius UCC118, and a mix of the probiotic strains of Bifidobacterium were able to reduce adiposity and body weight in experimental animals/human groups as well as limit disease progression by countering the adverse effects of the high-fat diet that is often seen in patients suffering from the disease [6]. The VSL #3 probiotic combination has been shown to improve glucose tolerance by stimulating the production of GLP-1 and SCFAs, especially butyrate, which in turn help in reducing food intake and adiposity [53]. Furthermore, many probiotic strains such as Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, L. rhamnosus Lc705, and Saccharomyces boulardii have been successful in clinical trials and are used for altering the composition of the host microbiome [104106].

Table 1:

Effects of probiotic bacteria in obesity in animal models.

Probiotic Bacteria Used Study Model (Animal) Major Findings and Effect on Gut microbiota (if any reported) Reference
Lactobacillus mali APS 1 HFD-fed mice ↓ BW (body weight), caloric intake and fat accumulation. Gut microbiota restored. Chen et al., 2018 [116]
B. lactis Bil, B. breve Bbr8 and B. breve BL10 mixture HFD-fed mice Prevents the progression of obesity, reduces adiposity and inflammation and improves lipid profile. Roselli et al., 2018 [117]
L. plantarum HAC01 C57BL/6J HFD-fed mice Improved insulin sensitivity and gut permeability ↓ LPS production. Park et al., 2017 [118]
L. rhamnosus NCDC17 HFD and streptozotocin treated Wistar rats ↑ Insulin Sensitivity, glycosylated hemoglobin, FFA, TGs Improved lipid profile and oxidative stress. ↑ GLP1 and adiponectin, ↓ Inflammation by decreasing pro-inflammatory cytokines and propionate (in caecum) Singh et al., 2017 [119]
Probiotic mixture (L. salivarius 33, L. rhamnosus LMG S-28148, B. animalis subsp. lactis LMG P-28149) C57BL/6J HFD-fed mice ↓ BW and adiposity with improvement in insulin resistance, ↓ adipose tissue inflammation, ↑ dyslipidemia through adipose tissue immune cell-remodeling Alai’d et al., 2016 [120]
Lactobacillus sakei OK67 HFD-fed mice ↓ BW and epididymal fat, NF- κB activation, LPS production, and pro-inflammatory cytokines Lim et al, 2016 [121]
Lactobacillus paracasei CNCM 1–4270 (LC), L. rhamnosus 1–3690 (LR) and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp (BA) HFD-fed mice Each strain changed a distinct set of microbial population. LC and LR increased cecal acetate levels. BA significantly decreased adipose and hepatic tumor necrosis factor-α gene expression. Attenuates obesity. Wang et al, 2014 [122]
L. coryniformis CECT5711 C57BL/6J HFD-fed mice Improve insulin sensitivity and gut permeability ↓ LPS production. Toral et al., 2014 [123]
L. casei NCDC 19 C57BL/6J HFD-fed mice ↓ BW, epididymal fat, blood glucose, plasma lipids and leptin f adiponectin Rather et al., 2014 [124]
VSL#3 C57J/B67 HFD-fed and ob/ob mice ↓ adiposity Yadav et al., 2013 [125]
L. salivarius UCC118 C57BL/J6 HFD-fed mice ↓ BW Clarke et al., 2013 [126]

Table 2:

Effects of probiotic bacteria in obesity in human studies.

Probiotic Bacteria Used Study Model (Human) Major Findings Reference
Dietary supplementation with probiotics Dietary supplementation with probiotics/ placebo controlled Significantly alters the levels of DNA methylation in 38 obesity related genes in mothers and 68 genes in children. Vahamiko et al, 2018 [127]
L. salivarius UBL S22 and Prebiotic Fructoligosaccharide in healthy human volunteers Double-blind, placebo controlled Improvement in serum TGs and lipid profile ↓. inflammatory cytokines Rajkumar et al., 2015 [128]
Probiotic (S. thermophiles, L. plantarum, L. acidophilus. L. rhamnosus. B. lactis. B. longum and B. breve) and Bofutsushosan herb Double-blind, placebo controlled ↓ BW, waist circumference and Fipid profile (in HDF-cholesterol). Change in body composition is positively related to levels of EPS and L. plantarum Lee et al., 2014 [129]

Alteration of microbiota to confer health benefits can be achieved by fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT). FMT is defined as the administration of a solution of fecal matter from a healthy donor into the intestinal tract of a recipient to directly change the recipient’s microbial configuration. FMT has proven to be effective in treating Clostridium difficile infection. There are also encouraging data in intestinal disorders like IBD, IBS, and MetS [107]. Fecal transplant from captive non-human primates on a low-fiber diet to GF mice induced obesity in the recipient mice, indicating that the composition of gut microbiota, along with fiber and diet composition, can potentiate the disease state [108]. In another report, IR in high-fructose diet fed adult rats was reversed by FMT from their control group [109]. Additionally, after high fat or high fat/high sucrose diet-fed obese mice underwent FMT from resveratrol-fed donor mice, they exhibited improved glucose homeostasis with increased anti-inflammatory markers, indicating diminished symptoms of obesity [110]. Although FMT results are encouraging in animal models, there are only 11 clinical trials supporting FMT as a potential therapy for MetS and obesity. Also, Vrieze et al. [77] reported that when obese patients diagnosed with T2DM received FMT from healthy/lean donors there were no significant changes in BMI or insulin sensitivity, and no alteration in microbial diversity was noted.

Prebiotics, probiotics, and FMT techniques are becoming more attractive potential therapies to treat microbial dysbiosis and metabolic diseases due to their few side effects - no major consequences have been reported so far. However, more detailed research needs to be done with proper standards and assessment to further establish the direct role of the microbiota in diseases. Different bile acid receptors - at least four members of the NR superfamily (FXR, PXR, CAR and VDR) - are therapeutic targets for the treatment of cholestatic liver disease, fatty liver disease, diabetes mellitus, and metabolic syndrome [53,111]. The application of targeting nuclear receptors, such as VDR, and the microbiome in therapy warrants further exploration.

8. Conclusion

Dietary vitamin D is critical for a healthy state. VDR is involved in many important functions, including immunomodulation, proliferation, and autophagy via distinct effector molecules (Figure 2). The status and function of VDR directly influences microbiome and is involved in innate immunity and epigenetic modulation of the host. Vitamin D/VDR deficiency is a health concern in metabolic diseases. Recent progress of microbiome and vitamin D/VDR in inflammation and disease are very encouraging. A link between VDR and microbial metabolites has been established, but studies linking nuclear receptors, microbiome, and FMT are still lacking.

Figure 2: Vitamin D receptor in regulating various cellular and molecular functions:

Figure 2:

VDR regulates many vital physiological functions including immuno-modulation, proliferation, and autophagy via distinct effector molecules (as mentioned in the respective box). It directly influences the gut-microbiome and is involved in epigenetic modulation of the host. VDR is also known to block pathogen infection by regulating Paneth cells and anti-microbial peptides, such as defensins.

The research progress of microbiota regulated by Vitamin D receptor is an example of the critical role of nuclear receptors. Similar to the VDR, other nuclear receptors, such as the aryl hydrocarbon receptor, also regulate intestinal microbiome, enhance barrier integrity, reduce inflammation and autoimmunity, and increases disease tolerance. Tryptophan metabolites may suppress inflammatory responses by acting on the aryl hydrocarbon receptor in T-cells or astrocytes [112115]. Further elucidating the mechanisms for microbiota and nuclear receptors will provide new opportunities to develop novel approaches that prevent and treat metabolic diseases.

Acknowledgement

This project was supported by the NIDDK R01DK105118–01 and R01DK114126 to Jun Sun.

Footnotes

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

  • [1].Samson SL and Garber AJ, “Metabolic syndrome, “ Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Batsis JA, Romero-Corral A, Collazo-Clavell ML, Sarr MG, Somers VK, and Lopez-Jimenez F, “Effect of bariatric surgery on the metabolic syndrome: A population-based, long-term controlled study,” Mayo Clinic Proceedings, vol. 83 no. 8, pp. 897–906. 2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Yamada T, Takahashi D, and Hase K, “The diet-microbiota-metabolite axis regulates the host physiology,” The Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 160, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Brown CT, Sharon I, Thomas BC, Castelle CJ, Morowitz MJ, and Banfield JF, “Genome resolved analysis of a premature infant gut microbial community reveals a Varibaculum cambriense genome and a shift towards fermentation-based metabolism during the third week of life,” Microbiome, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 30, 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Brown EM, Sadarangani M, and Finlay BB, “The role of the immune system in governing host-microbe interactions in the intestine,” Nature Immunology, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 660–667, 2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Celiberto LS, Graef FA, Healey GR et al. , “Inflammatory bowel disease and immunonutrition: novel therapeutic approaches through modulation of diet and the gut microbiome,” The Journal of Immunology. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Clemente JC, Ursell LK, Parfrey LW, and Knight R, “The impact of the gut microbiota on human health: an integrative view,” Cell, vol. 148, no. 6, pp. 1258–1270, 2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Gopalakrishnan V, Helmink BA, Spencer CN, Reuben A, and Wargo JA, “The Influence of the Gut Microbiome on Cancer, Immunity, and Cancer Immunotherapy,” Cancer Cell, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 570–580, 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Mohajeri ΜH, La Fata G, Steinert RE, and Weber P, “Relationship between the gut microbiome and brain function,” Nutrition Reviews, vol. 76, no. 7, pp. 481–496, 2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Thaiss CA, Zmora N, Levy M, and Elinav E, “The microbiome and innate immunity,” Nature, vol. 535, no. 7610, pp. 65–74, 2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Zhu L, Baker RD, Zhu R, and Baker SS, “Bile Acids and the Gut Microbiome as Potential Targets for NAFLD Treatment,” Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 3–5, 2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Koliada A, Syzenko G, Moseiko V et al. , “Association between body mass index and Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio in an adult Ukrainian population,” BMC Microbiology, vol. 17, no. 1, article no. 120, 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Tilg H and Kaser A, “Gut microbiome, obesity, and metabolic dysfunction,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 121, no. 6, pp. 2126–2132, 2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Belizário JE and Napolitano M, “Human microbiomes and their roles in dysbiosis, common diseases, and novel therapeutic approaches,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 6, 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Everard A, Belzer C, Geurts L et al. , “Cross-talk between Akkermansia muciniphila and intestinal epithelium controls diet-induced obesity,” Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 110, no. 22, pp. 9066–9071, 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Haussler MR, Whitfield GK, Kaneko I et al. , “Molecular mechanisms of vitamin D action,” Calcified Tissue International, vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 77–98, 2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Uhlen M, Fagerberg L, Hallstrom BM et al. , “Tissue-based map of the human proteome,” Science, vol. 347, Article ID 1260419, 2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Trochoutsou AI, Kloukina V, Samitas K, and Xanthou G, “Vitamin-D in the immune system: Genomic and non-genomic actions,” Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 953–963, 2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Azrielant S and Shoenfeld Y, “Vitamin D and autoimmune diseases,” Indian Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 12, no. 4, p. 219,2017. [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Oh J, Riek A, Darwech I et al. , “Deletion of macrophage vitamin d receptor promotes insulin resistance and monocyte cholesterol transport to accelerate atherosclerosis in mice,” Cell Reports, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 1872–1886, 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Moreno-Santos I, Castellano-Castillo D, Lara M, Fernandez-Garcia J, Tinahones F, and Macias-Gonzalez M, “IGFBP-3 Interacts with the Vitamin D Receptor in Insulin Signaling Associated with Obesity in Visceral Adipose Tissue,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 18, no. 11, p. 2349, 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Sun J, “VDR/vitamin D receptor regulates autophagic activity through ATG16L1,” Autophagy, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 1057–1058, 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Ezhilarasi K, Dhamodharan U, and Vijay V, “BSMI single nucleotide polymorphism in vitamin D receptor gene is associated with decreased circulatory levels of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D among micro and macrovascular complications of type 2 diabetes mellitus,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol. 116, pp. 346–353,2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Ben-Selma W, Ben-Fredj N, Chebel S, Frih-Ayed M, Aouni M, and Boukadida J, “Age- and genderspecific effects on VDR gene polymorphisms and risk of the development of multiple sclerosis in Tunisians: A preliminary study,” International Journal of Immunogenetics, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 174–181, 2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Angel B, Lera L, Marquez C, and Albala C, “The association of VDR polymorphisms and type 2 diabetes in older people living in community in Santiago de Chile,” Nutrition & Diabetes, vol. 8, no. 1, 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Gisbert-Ferrándiz L, Salvador P, Ortiz-Masiá D et al. , “A Single Nucleotide Polymorphism in the Vitamin D Receptor Gene Is Associated With Decreased Levels of the Protein and a Penetrating Pattern in Crohn’s Disease,” Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 1462–1470, 2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Lim H, Kim T, Lee H, Kim S, Lee B, and Park Y, “Relationship between Serum 25-hydroxy-vitamin D Concentration and Risk of Metabolic Syndrome in Patients with Fatty Liver,” Journal of Bone Metabolism, vol. 24, no. 4, p.223, 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Tabesh M, Callegari ΕT, Gorelik A et al. , “Associations between 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels, body composition and metabolic profiles in young women,” European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].De Pergola G, Triggiani V, Bartolomeo N et al. , “Low 25 Hydroxyvitamin D Levels are Independently Associated with Autoimmune Thyroiditis in a Cohort of Apparently Healthy Overweight and Obese Subjects,” Endocrine, Metabolic & Immune Disorders - Drug Targets, vol. 18, 2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Gubatan J, Mitsuhashi S, Zenlea T, Rosenberg L, Robson S, and Moss AC, “Low Serum Vitamin D During Remission Increases Risk of Clinical Relapse in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis,” Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 240–246.el, 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Wu S, Zhang YG, and Lu R, “Intestinal epithelial vitamin D receptor deletion leads to defective autophagy in colitis,” Gut. 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Oh J, Riek AE, Zhang RM, Williams SA, Darwech I, and Bernal-Mizrachi C, “Deletion of JNK2 prevents vitamin-D-deficiency-induced hypertension and atherosclerosis in mice,” The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, vol. 177, pp. 179–186, 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Girgis CM, Cha KM, Houweling PJ et al. , “Vitamin D Receptor Ablation and Vitamin D Deficiency Result in Reduced Grip Strength, Altered Muscle Fibers, and Increased Myostatin in Mice,” Calcified Tissue International, vol. 97, no. 6, pp. 602–610, 2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Giblin RJ, Bennett EJ, Zosky GR, and Dwyer RM, “The impact of sex and 25(OH)D deficiency on metabolic function in mice,” Nutrients, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 1–14, 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Barbáchano A, Fernández-Barral A, Ferrer-Mayorga G, Costales-Carrera A, Larriba MJ, and Munoz A, “The endocrine vitamin D system in the gut,” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, vol. 453, pp. 79–87, 2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Salem M, Ammitzboell M, Nys K, Seidelin JB, and Nielsen ΟH, “ATG16L1: A multifunctional susceptibility factor in crohn disease,” Autophagy. vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 585–594, 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Chang C, Lin C, and Lu C, “Ganoderma lucidum reduces obesity in mice by modulating the composition of the gut microbiota,” Nature Communications, vol. 23, article 7489, no. 6, 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Chang C, Lin C, Lu C et al. , “Corrigendum: Ganoderma lucidum reduces obesity in mice by modulating the composition of the gut microbiota,” Nature Communications, vol. 8, p. 16130, 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Sanmiguel C, Gupta A, and Mayer EA, “Gut microbiome and obesity: a plausible explanation for obesity,” Current Obesity Reports, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 250–261, 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Ussar S, Griffin NW, Bezy O et al. , “Interactions between gut microbiota, host genetics and diet modulate the predisposition to obesity and metabolic syndrome,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 516–530, 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Boulangé CL, Neves AL, Chilloux J, Nicholson JK, and Dumas M, “Impact of the gut microbiota on inflammation, obesity, and metabolic disease,” Genome Medicine, vol. 8, article 42, 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [42].Duncan SH, Belenguer A, Holtrop G, Johnstone AM, Flint HJ, and Lobley GE, “Reduced dietary intake of carbohydrates by obese subjects results in decreased concentrations of butyrate and butyrate-producing bacteria in feces,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 1073–1078, 2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [43].Fernandes J, Su W, Rahat-Rozenbloom S, Wolever TMS, and Comelli EM, “Adiposity, gut microbiota and faecal short chain fatty acids are linked in adult humans,” Nutrition & Diabetes, vol. 4, article el21, 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [44].Salazar N, Dewulf EM, Neyrinck AM et al. , “Inulin-type fructans modulate intestinal Bifidobacterium species populations and decrease fecal short-chain fatty acids in obese women,” Clinical Nutrition, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 501–507, 2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [45].de Groot PF, Frissen MN, de Clercq NC, and Nieuwdorp M, “Fecal microbiota transplantation in metabolic syndrome: History, present and future,” Gut Microbes, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 253–267, 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [46].Cani PD et al. , “Metabolic endotoxemia initiates obesity and insulin resistance,” Diabetes, vol. 56, no. 7, pp. 1761–72, 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [47].Khondkaryan Lusine, Margaryan Sona, Poghosyan David, and Manukyan Gayane, “Impaired Inflammatory Response to LPS in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus,” International Journal of Inflammation, vol. 2018, Article ID 2157434, 6 pages, 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [48].Keskitalo A, Munukka E, Toivonen R et al. , “Enterobacter cloacae administration induces hepatic damage and subcutaneous fat accumulation in high-fat diet fed mice,” PLoS ONE, vol. 13, no. 5, p. e0198262, 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [49].Battson M, Abstract 165: Role of the Gut Microbiome in Obesity-Related Vascular Dysfunction. Circulation Research, vol. 121, supplement 1, 121, p. A165–A165, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • [50].Gomes AC, Hoffmann C, and Mota JF, “The human gut microbiota: Metabolism and perspective in obesity,” Gut Microbes, pp. 1–18, 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [51].Ellekilde M, Selfjord E, Larsen CS et al. , “Transfer of gut microbiota from lean and obese mice to antibiotictreated mice,” Scientific Reports, vol. 4, article no. 5922, 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [52].Rajani C and Jia W, “Disruptions in gut microbial-host co-metabolism and the development of metabolic disorders,” Clinical Science, vol. 132, no. 7, pp. 791–811, 2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [53].Jia W, Xie G, and Jia W, “Bile acid-microbiota crosstalk in gastrointestinal inflammation and carcinogenesis,” Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 111–128, 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [54].Tang WHW, Wang Z, Li XS et al. , “Increased trimethylamine N-oxide portends high mortality risk independent of glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus,” Clinical Chemistry, vol. 63, no. l, pp. 297–306, 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [55].Schugar RC, Shih DM, Warrier M et al. , “The TMAO-Producing Enzyme Flavin-Containing Monooxygenase 3 Regulates Obesity and the Beiging of White Adipose Tissue,” Cell Reports, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 279, 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [56].Organ CL, Otsuka H, Bhushan S et al. , “Choline Diet and Its Gut Microbe-Derived Metabolite, Trimethylamine N-Oxide, Exacerbate Pressure Overload-Induced Heart Failure,” Circulation: Heart Failure, vol. 9, no. 1, 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [57].Sun J and Dudeja PK, Mechanisms Underlying Host-Microbiome Interactions in Pathophysiology of Human Diseases, Springer US, Boston, MA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • [58].Alang N and Kelly CR, “Weight Gain After Fecal Microbiota Transplantation,” Open Forum Infectious Diseases, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. ofv004–ofv004, 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [59].Chassaing B, “Colonic Microbiota Encroachment Correlates With Dysglycemia in Humans,” Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 205–221, 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [60].Tremaroli V, Karlsson F, Werling M et al. , “Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Vertical Banded Gastroplasty Induce Long-Term Changes on the Human Gut Microbiome Contributing to Fat Mass Regulation,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 228–238, 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [61].Wu H, “Metformin alters the gut microbiome of individuals with treatment-naive type 2 diabetes, contributing to the therapeutic effects of the drug,” Nat Med, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 850–858, 2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [62].Jin D, Wu S, Zhang Y-G et al. , “Lack of Vitamin D Receptor Causes Dysbiosis and Changes the Functions of the Murine Intestinal Microbiome,” Clinical Therapeutics, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 996–1009.e7, 2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [63].Szeto FF, “Involvement of the vitamin D receptor in the regulation of NF-kappaB activity in fibroblasts,” J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol, p. 103, 2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [64].Kongsbak M, Levring TB, Geisler C, and von Essen MR, “The Vitamin D Receptor and T Cell Function,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 4, 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [65].Zhang YG et al. , “Intestinal tight junction CFDN2 gene is a direct target of the vitamin D receptor,” Faseb Journal, p. 29, 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [66].Gombart AF, Borregaard N, and Koeffler HP, “Human cathelicidin antimicrobial peptide (CAMP) gene is a direct target of the vitamin D receptor and is strongly up-regulated in myeloid cells by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 1067–1077, 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [67].Lu D, Lan B, Din Z, Chen H, and Chen G, “A vitamin D receptor agonist converts CD4+ T cells to Foxp3+ regulatory T cells in patients with ulcerative colitis,” Oncotarget, vol. 8, no. 32, 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [68].Bakdash G, van Capel TΜM, Mason LΜK, Kapsenberg ML, and de Jong EC, “Vitamin D3 metabolite calcidiol primes human dendritic cells to promote the development of immunomodulatory IL-10-producing T cells,” Vaccine, vol. 32, no. 47, pp. 6294–6302, 2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [69].Barragan M, Good M, and Kolls J, “Regulation of dendritic cell function by vitamin D,” Nutrients, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 8127–8151,2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [70].Chen Y, Zhang J, Ge X, Du J, Deb DK, and Li YC, “Vitamin D receptor inhibits nuclear factor κb activation by interacting with IκB kinase β protein,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 288, no. 27, pp. 19450–19458,2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [71].Sun J, Kong J, Duan Y et al. , “Increased NF-κΒ activity in fibroblasts lacking the vitamin D receptor,” American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 291, no. 2, pp. E315–E322, 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [72].Lin H, Yu C, Jen C et al. , “Adiponectin-mediated heme oxygenase-1 induction protects against iron-induced liver injury via a PPARα-dependent mechanism,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 177, no. 4, pp. 1697–1709, 2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [73].Wu S, Xia Y, Liu X, and Sun J, “Vitamin D receptor deletion leads to reduced level of ΙκΒα protein through protein translation, protein-protein interaction, and post-translational modification,” The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 329–336, 2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [74].Ma D, Zhang R-N, Wen Y et al. , “1, 25(OH)2D3-induced interaction of vitamin D receptor with p50 subunit of NF-κΒ suppresses the interaction between KLF5 and p50, contributing to inhibition of LPS-induced macrophage proliferation,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 482, no. 2, pp. 366–374, 2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [75].Singh PK, van den Berg PR, Long MD et al. , “Integration of VDR genome wide binding and GWAS genetic variation data reveals co-occurrence of VDR and NF-ΚΒ binding that is linked to immune phenotypes,” BMC Genomics, vol. 18, no. 1, article no. 132, 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [76].Barengolts E, “Vitamin D and Prebiotics May Benefit the Intestinal Microbacteria and Improve Glucose Homeostasis in Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes,” Endocrine Practice, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 497–510, 2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [77].Vrieze A, Van Nood E, and Holleman F, “Erratum: Transfer of intestinal microbiota from lean donors increases insulin sensitivity in individuals with metabolic syndrome (Gastroenterology (2012) 143 (913–916)),” Gastroenterology, vol. 144, no. 1, p. 250, 2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [78].Wang J, Thingholm LB, Skiecevičienė J, Rausch P, Kummen M, and Hov JR, “Genome-wide association analysis identifies variation in vitamin D receptor and other host factors influencing the gut microbiota,” Nature Genetics, vol. 48, no. 11, pp. 1396–1406, 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [79].Lu R, Wu S, Xia Y, and Sun J, “The vitamin D receptor, inflammatory bowel diseases, and colon cancer,” Current Colorectal Cancer Reports, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 57–65, 2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [80].Ardesia Marco, Ferlazzo Guido, and Fries Walter, “Vitamin D and Inflammatory Bowel Disease,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2015, Article ID 470805, 16 pages, 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [81].Meeker S, Seamons A, Maggio-Price L, and Paik J, “Protective links between Vitamin D, inflammatory bowel disease and colon cancer,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 933–948, 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [82].Clark A and Mach N, “Role of vitamin D in the hygiene hypothesis: The interplay between vitamin D, vitamin D receptors, gut microbiota, and immune response,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 7, 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [83].Bakke D and Sun J, “Ancient Nuclear Receptor VDR With New Functions: Microbiome and Inflammation,” Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 1149–1154, 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [84].Peirce V, Carobbio S, and Vidal-Puig A, “The different shades of fat,” Nature, vol. 510, no. 7503, pp. 76–83, 2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [85].Matthews DG, D’Angelo J, Drelich J, and Welsh J, “Adipose-specific Vdr deletion alters body fat and enhances mammary epithelial density,” The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, vol. 164, pp. 299–308, 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [86].Chang E and Kim Y, “Vitamin D insufficiency exacerbates adipose tissue macrophage infiltration and decreases AMPK/SIRT1 activity in obese rats,” Nutrients, vol. 9, no. 4, article no. 338, 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [87].Hernández-Sánchez F, Guzmán-Beltrán S, Herrera ΜT et al. , “High glucose induces O-GlcNAc glycosylation of the vitamin D receptor (VDR) in THP1 cells and in human macrophages derived from monocytes,” Cell Biology International, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 1065–1074, 2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [88].Zenata O and Vrzal R, “Fine tuning of vitamin D receptor (VDR) activity by post-transcriptional and post-translational modifications,” Oncotarget, vol. 8, no. 21, pp. 35390–35402, 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [89].De La Fuente AG, Errea O, Van Wijngaarden P et al. , “Vitamin D receptor-retinoid X receptor heterodimer signaling regulates oligodendrocyte progenitor cell differentiation,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 211, no. 5, pp. 975–985, 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [90].Belorusova AY, Eberhardt J, Potier N, Stote RH, Dejaegere A, and Rochel N, “Structural insights into the molecular mechanism of vitamin D receptor activation by lithocholic acid involving a new mode of ligand recognition,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 57, no. 11, pp. 4710–4719, 2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [91].Ishizawa M, Akagi D, and Makishima M, “Lithocholic Acid Is a Vitamin D Receptor Ligand That Acts Preferentially in the Ileum,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 19, no. 7, p. 1975, 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [92].Chen X, Chen F, Liu S et al. , “Transactivation of Rat Apical Sodium-Dependent Bile Acid Transporter and Increased Bile Acid Transport by 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 via the Vitamin D Receptor,” Molecular Pharmacology, vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 1913–1923, 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [93].Wobke TK, Sorg BL, and Steinhilber D, “Vitamin D in inflammatory diseases,” Frontiers in Physiology, vol. 5, article 244, 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [94].A1-Daghri NM, Guerini FR, A1-Attas OS et al. , “Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms are associated with obesity and inflammosome activity,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 7, Article ID el02141, 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [95].Gibson PS, Quaglia A, Dhawan A et al. , “Vitamin D status and associated genetic polymorphisms in a cohort of UK children with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease,” Pediatric Obesity, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 433–441. 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [96].Gao R, Zhu C, Li H et al. , “Dysbiosis Signatures of Gut Microbiota Along the Sequence from Healthy, Young Patients to Those with Overweight and Obesity,” Obesity, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 351–361, 2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [97].Zhang P, Meng X, Li D, Calderone R, Mao D, and Sui B, “Commensal Homeostasis of Gut Microbiota-Host for the Impact of Obesity,” Frontiers in Physiology, vol. 8, 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [98].Umu ÖC, Rudi K, and Diep DB, “Modulation of the gut microbiota by prebiotic fibres and bacteriocins,” Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease, vol. 28, no. 1, p. 1348886, 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [99].Zhang Q, Wu Y, and Fei X, “Effect of probiotics on body weight and body-mass index: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials,” International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 571–580, 2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [100].Scarpellini E, Ianiro G, Attili F, Bassanelli C, De Santis A, and Gasbarrini A, “The human gut microbiota and virome: Potential therapeutic implications,” Digestive and Liver Disease, vol. 47, no. 12, pp. 1007–1012, 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [101].Sheth RU, Cabral V, Chen SP, and Wang HH, “Manipulating Bacterial Communities by in situ Microbiome Engineering,” Trends in Genetics, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 189–200, 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [102].Lozupone CA, Stombaugh JI, Gordon JI, Jansson JK, and Knight R, “Diversity, stability and resilience of the human gut microbiota,” Nature, vol. 489, no. 7415, pp. 220–230, 2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [103].Zhang H-L, Yu L-X, Yang W et al. , “Profound impact of gut homeostasis on chemically-induced protumorigenic inflammation and hepatocarcinogenesis in rats,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 803–812, 2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [104].Kajander K, Myllyluoma E, Rajilić-Stojanović M et al. , “Clinical trial: multispecies probiotic supplementation alleviates the symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome and stabilizes intestinal microbiota,” Alimentary Pharmacology’ & Therapeutics, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 48–57, 2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [105].Villar-García J, Güerri-Fernández R, Moya A et al. , “Impact of probiotic Saccharomyces boulardii on the gut microbiome composition in HIV-treated patients: A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial,” PLoS ONE, vol. 12, no. 4, Article ID e0173802, 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [106].Mobini R, Tremaroli V, Ståhlman M et al. , “Metabolic effects of Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 in people with type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial,” Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 579–589, 2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [107].Bakker GJ and Nieuwdorp M, “Fecal Microbiota Transplantation: Therapeutic Potential for a Multitude of Diseases beyond Clostridium difficile,” Microbiology Spectrum, vol. 5, no. 4, 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [108].Sidiropoulos D, Clayton N;, Al-Ghalith Jonathan;., and Shields-Cutler Gabe;., “Wild Primate Gut Microbiota Protect Against Obesity,” Primate Gut Microbiota Protect Against Obesity, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • [109].Di Luccia B, Crescenzo R, Mazzoli A et al. , “Rescue of fructose-induced metabolic syndrome by antibiotics or faecal transplantation in a rat model of obesity,” PLoS ONE, vol. 10, no. 8, Article ID e0134893, 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [110].Kim T, Madsen K, and Dyck J, “Feces of Resveratrol-Fed Mice Improves Glucose Homeostasis in Obese Mice Through Reduction of Intestinal Inflammation,” Canadian Journal of Diabetes, vol. 41, no. 5, p. S83, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • [111].Copple BL and Li T, “Pharmacology of bile acid receptors: Evolution of bile acids from simple detergents to complex signaling molecules,” Pharmacological Research, vol. 104, pp. 9–21, 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [112].Haase S, Haghikia A, Wilck N, Müller DN, and Linker RA, “Impacts of microbiome metabolites on immune regulation and autoimmunity,” The Journal of Immunology. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [113].Kim CH, “Immune regulation by microbiome metabolites,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 154, no. 2, pp. 220–229,2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [114].Zhang L, Nichols RG, and Patterson AD, “The aryl hydrocarbon receptor as a moderator of host-microbiota communication,” Current Opinion in Toxicology, vol. 2, pp. 30–35, 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [115].Gao J et al. , “Impact of the Gut Microbiota on Intestinal Immunity Mediated by Tryptophan Metabolism,” Front Cell Infect Microbiol, vol. 8, p. 13, 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [116].Chen Y, Yang N, Lin Y et al. , “A combination of Lactobacillus mali APS1 and dieting improved the efficacy of obesity treatment via manipulating gut microbiome in mice,” Scientific Reports, vol. 8, no. 1, 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [117].Roselli M, Finamore A, Brasili E et al. , “Beneficial effects of a selected probiotic mixture administered to high fat-fed mice before and after the development of obesity,” Journal of Functional Foods, vol. 45, pp. 321–329, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • [118].Park S, Ji Y, Jung H-Y et al. , “Lactobacillus plantarum HAC01 regulates gut microbiota and adipose tissue accumulation in a diet-induced obesity murine model,” Applied Microbiology’ and Biotechnology, vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 1605–1614, 2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [119].Singh S, Sharma RK, Malhotra S, Pothuraju R, and Shandilya UK, “Lactobacillus rhamnosus NCDC17 ameliorates type-2 diabetes by improving gut function, oxidative stress and inflammation in high-fat-diet fed and streptozotocintreated rats,” Beneficial Microbes, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 243–255, 2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [120].Alard J, Lehrter V, Rhimi M et al. , “Beneficial metabolic effects of selected probiotics on diet-induced obesity and insulin resistance in mice are associated with improvement of dysbiotic gut microbiota,” Environmental Microbiology, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 1484–1497, 2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [121].Lim S-M, Jeong J-J, Woo KH, Han MJ, and Kim D-H, “Lactobacillus sakei OK67 ameliorates highfat diet-induced blood glucose intolerance and obesity in mice by inhibiting gut microbiota lipopolysaccharide production and inducing colon tight junction protein expression,” Nutrition Research, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 337–348, 2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [122].Wang J, Tang H, Zhang C et al. , “Modulation of gut microbiota during probiotic-mediated attenuation of metabolic syndrome in high fat diet-fed mice,” The ISME Journal, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [123].Toral M, Gómez-Guzmán M, Jiménez R et al. , “The probiotic Lactobacillus coryniformis CECT5711 reduces the vascular pro-oxidant and pro-inflammatory status in obese mice,” Clinical Science, vol. 127, no. 1, pp. 33–45, 2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [124].Rather SA, Pothuraju R, Sharma RK, De S, Mir NA, and Jangra S, “Anti-obesity effect of feeding probiotic dahi containing Lactobacillus casei NCDC 19 in high fat diet-induced obese mice,” International Journal of Dairy Technology, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 504–509, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • [125].Yadav H, Lee JH, Lloyd J, Walter P, and Rane SG, “Beneficial metabolic effects of a probiotic via butyrate-induced GLP-1 hormone secretion,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry’, vol. 288, no. 35, pp. 25088–25097, 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [126].Clarke SF, F Murphy E, O’Sullivan O et al. , “Targeting the Microbiota to Address Diet-Induced Obesity: A Time Dependent Challenge,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 6, Article ID e65790, 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [127].Vähämiko S, Laiho A, Lund R, Isolauri E, Salminen S, and Laitinen K, “The impact of probiotic supplementation during pregnancy on DNA methylation of obesity-related genes in mothers and their children,” European Journal of Nutrition. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [128].Rajkumar H, Kumar M, Das N, Kumar SN, Challa HR, and Nagpal R, “Effect of Probiotic Lactobacillus salivarius UBL S22 and Prebiotic Fructo-oligosaccharid on Serum Lipids, Inflammatory Markers, Insulin Sensitivity, and Gut Bacteria in Healthy Young Volunteers: A Randomized Controlled Single-Blind Pilot Study,” Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 289–298, 2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [129].Lee SJ, Bose S, Seo J-G, Chung W-S, Lim C-Y, and Kim H, “The effects of co-administration of probiotics with herbal medicine on obesity, metabolic endotoxemia and dysbiosis: A randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial,” Clinical Nutrition, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 973–981, 2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES