Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 28;8(3):215–224. doi: 10.1002/sctm.18-0053

Table 3.

Outcomes for visual analog, pain, stiffness, and functional scales at 6 and 12 months follow‐up

Outcomes HA group MSC‐1 group MSC‐2 group Difference between treatments a Multiple comparison b
At 6 months
WOMAC
Total 18.6 ± 14.7 13.8 ± 9.2 8.3 ± 5.1 .2
A. Pain (0–20) 4.2 ± 3.8 2.1 ± 1.4 2.4 ± 1.7 .36
B. Stiffness (0–8) 1.1 ± 1.8 1.4 ± 1.2 0.9 ± 0.9 .54
C. Function (0–68) 13.3 ± 6.9 10.3 ± 7.2 5 ± 3.1 .07
VAS 0–100, mm 28 ± 8.7 12 ± 7.5 10.8 ± 7.8 .09
At 12 months
WOMAC
Total 15.2 ± 11 14.9 ± 12.7 4.2 ± 3.9 .04 HA vs. MSC‐2 .05
A. Pain (0–20) 4.3 ± 3.5 3.7 ± 2.6 1.1 ± 1.3 .04 HA vs. MSC‐2 .04
B. Stiffness (0–8) 1.7 ± 1.4 1.7 ± 2.1 0.6 ± 0.8 .14
C. Function (0–68) 9.2 ± 9.4 9.5 ± 7.4 2.6 ± 2.3 .08
VAS 0–100, mm 22.1 ± 9.8 13.3 ± 8.4 2.4 ± 2.1 .02 HA vs. MSC‐2 .03

Data are presented as mean ± SD.

Bolded p values are statistically significant.

a p value of Kruskal‐Wallis one‐way analysis of variance‐by‐ranks.

b p value of multiple comparison of mean ranks.

Abbreviations: HA, hyaluronic acid; MSC, mesenchymal stromal cells; VAS, visual analog scale; WOMAC, Western Ontario and Mc Master Universities Arthritis Index.