Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 28;47(4):2002–2010. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1208

Table 1.

Rate constants for different nutritional media (the numbers in parenthesis correspond to standard error)

Nutrition k in (min−1) k out (min−1) FIR = (kin/kout) τ (min) R 2 *** # of cells analyzed
100% nutrition* 0.30 (0.04) 0.32 (0.04) 1.0 (0.1) 2.40 (0.3) 0.58 20
50% nutrition* 0.16 (0.03) 0.10 (0.02) 1.6 (0.2) 8.8 (2.2) 0.97 4
25% nutrition* 0.18 (0.04) 0.08 (0.03) 2.2 (0.2) 12.6 (2.7) 0.97 6
No nutrition* 0.18 (0.04) 0.06 (0.02) 3.0 (0.5) 14.3(2.0) 0.96 20
100% nutrition + 2 mM puromycin n.d. n.d. 0.81 (0.1) 1.06 (0.1)** 0.31 11
no nutrition + 2 mM puromycin n.d. n.d. 0.9 (0.06) 1.13 (0.1)** 0.28 5
100% nutrition + 1 min nocodazole n.d. n.d. 0.87 9.3 (2.3)** 0.77 11
100% nutrition + 1 h nocodazole n.d. n.d. 1.16 10.5 (1.5)** 0.94 7
100% nutrition + 2 h nocodazole n.d. n.d. 1.22 10 (1.5)** 0.93 6
100% nutrition + 3 h nocodazole n.d. n.d. 1.45 6.8 (1.1)** 0.94 6
100% nutrition + 4 h nocodazole n.d. n.d. 1.4 5.5 (0.9)** 0.95 6

* Reaction rate constants determined by fitting data to Equation (1).

** Time constants determined by fitting data to equation SE7.

*** Coefficient of determination [42]

n.d. – not determined. Attempts to fit the data to Equation (1) in the presence of either puromycin or nocodazole failed to converge. The reaction rate constants were determined with equation SI–SE8.