Table 1.
Study | Representativenes of the exposed cohort | Selection of the non-exposed cohort | Ascertainment of exposure | Demonstration that outcome of interest was not present at start of study | Comparability of cohorts on the basis of the gender | Comparability of cohorts on the basis of the age | Assessment of outcome | Was follow-up long enough for outcomes to occur | Adequacy of follow up of cohorts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Konstantareas et al. (35) | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | |
Naito et al. (36) | * | * | * | * | * | * | |||
Sasamoto et al. (37) | * | * | * | * | * | * | |||
Solomon et al. (18) | * | * | * | * | * | ||||
Guo et al. (38) | * | * | * | ||||||
Jalbrzikowski et al. (39) | * | * | * | * | * | ||||
Lugnegard et al. (40) | * | * | * | * | * | * | |||
de Bildt et al. (41) | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | |
Matsuo et al. (42) | * | * | * | * | * | * | |||
Martinez et al. (43) | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | ||
Zhang et al. (44) | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | ||
Ota et al. (45) | * | * | * | * | |||||
Upthegrove et al. (46) | * | * | * |
item present. i.e., low risk of bias for for the variable considered.